Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
A Two-Step Method for Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy
Published on: September 13, 2022
Subtotal vs total cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Sylvia Sj Koo1, Rohin J Krishnan2, Kyle Ishikawa3
1John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA; Department of Surgery, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Introduction:
With severely inflamed gallbladders, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be difficult and may require procedures like subtotal cholecystectomy (SC). Few studies exist comparing SC and total cholecystectomy (TC) in the setting of severe biliary inflammation. This meta-analysis aims to compare SC and TC for difficult gallbladders.
Methods:
Medline-OVID, Embase-OVID, and Cinahl were searched including only studies comparing SC to TC for difficult gallbladders. Primary outcome was CBD injury. Secondary outcomes included bile leak, duodenal injury, retained stone, bleeding, intraabdominal collection, wound infection, reoperation, and mortality.
Results:
Ten studies were included. Compared to TC, SC significantly lowered the risk for CBD injury (0 % vs. 1.6 %, RR 0.30, 95%CI 0.10-0.87) but increased risk of bile leaks (RR 3.5, 95%CI 1.79-6.84), postoperative ERCP (RR 2.86, 95%CI 1.53-5.35), intraabdominal collections (RR 2.55, 95%CI 1.32-4.93), and reoperation (RR 2.92, 95%CI 1.14-7.47).
Conclusion:
SC is a reasonable alternative to difficult gallbladders that may decrease the risk of CBD injuries. Knowing both approaches is crucial to manage the difficult gallbladder while minimizing harm. Further studies are needed to understand the value of SC for difficult cholecystectomy.
