Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025
Combined Near-infrared Fluorescent Imaging and Micro-computed Tomography for Directly Visualizing Cerebral Thromboemboli
Published on: September 25, 2016
Effect of computed tomography vs. computed tomography perfusion on mechanical thrombectomy outcomes within 6 hours
Yingjian Pei1, Yuping Chen1, Wansi Zhong1
1Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Objectives:
It is unclear which selection strategy, plain CT vs. CT perfusion (CTP), is more powerful in predicting outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to compare the effect of plain CT and CTP in predicting outcome after MT within 6 h.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective analysis of a retrospective cohort from our single-center study, which had occlusion of the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery up to the proximal M2 segment and received MT within 6 h. According to the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), patients were divided into a high-ASPECTS group (≥ 6) and a low ASPECTS group (< 6). Similarly, patients were divided into mismatch and no-mismatch groups according to the DEFUSE3 criteria for CTP. A good outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 3. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between different imaging modality and 90-day mRS score, and mortalities, respectively.
Results:
The high ASPECTS group included 307 patients (89.2%). The mismatch group included 189 (54.9%) patients meeting the DEFUSE3 criterion. Compared to the low ASPECTS group, the high ASPECTS group had a good outcome (odds ratio (OR), 2.285; [95% confidence interval (CI) (1.106, 4.723)], p = 0.026) and lower mortality (OR, 0.350; [95% CI (0.163, 0.752)], p = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences in good outcomes and mortality between the mismatch and no-mismatch groups.
Conclusions:
Compared with plain CT, CTP does not provide additional benefits in the selection of patients suitable for MT within 6 h.
Clinical Relevance Statement:
CT perfusion is not superior to plain CT for the prediction of clinical outcomes when selecting patients for mechanical thrombectomy in the first 6 h. In that clinical setting, plain CT may be safe in the absence of perfusion data.
Key Points:
• The advantage of CT perfusion (CTP) over CT in pre-mechanical thrombectomy (MT) screening has not been proven for patients with a large infarct core. • CTP is not better than plain CT in predicting good outcome following MT within 6 h. • Plain CT is sufficient for selecting patients suitable for MT within 6 h of large artery occlusion.
