Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

102
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
102
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

94
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
94
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

170
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

129
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
129
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

43
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
43

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ATAC sequencing and transcriptomics reveal OsCHR732 function in regulating chromatin accessibility and gene expression in pollen and ovule development in rice.

BMC plant biology·2026
Same author

A deep learning framework for efficient pathology image analysis.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Differences in overall survival for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer by race and ethnicity: results from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

British journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Spatial biomarker discovery via interpretable semantic learning in histopathology.

Cancer cell·2026
Same author

Large language model consensus substantially improves the cell type annotation accuracy for scRNA-seq data.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

CDCP1 Deletion Protects Against Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction and Fibrosis in Mice.

Research square·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Batch-effect correction with sample remeasurement in highly confounded case-control studies.

Hanxuan Ye1, Xianyang Zhang2, Chen Wang3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Nature Computational Science
|January 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Batch effects in biomedical studies can be corrected by remeasuring samples. Our new statistical framework effectively corrects batch effects using remeasured samples, especially in confounded studies, preserving statistical power.

More Related Videos

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging
10:04

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging

Published on: April 12, 2014

16.4K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging
10:04

Sample Drift Correction Following 4D Confocal Time-lapse Imaging

Published on: April 12, 2014

16.4K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Batch effects are common in large-scale biomedical studies, potentially confounding results.
  • Current methods for correcting batch effects using remeasured samples are limited.
  • Addressing batch effects is crucial for accurate interpretation of case-control studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust statistical framework for batch-effect correction using remeasured samples.
  • To provide theoretical analysis and power evaluation for the proposed method.
  • To offer a tool for power calculation in study design involving batch correction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel framework for batch-effect correction in highly confounded case-control studies.
  • Utilized remeasured samples within each batch to estimate and adjust for batch effects.
  • Performed theoretical analyses and evaluated power characteristics of the correction procedure.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework effectively corrects batch effects using remeasured samples.
  • The number of samples requiring remeasurement is highly dependent on between-batch correlation.
  • High between-batch correlation allows for effective power rescue with a small subset of remeasured samples.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework offers a statistically rigorous approach to batch-effect correction.
  • Remeasuring a small subset of samples can be sufficient to mitigate batch effects when correlation is high.
  • The power calculation tool aids in optimizing study design for batch-corrected biomedical research.