Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2026

Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation
Published on: September 19, 2018
Costs and Readmissions Associated with Type A Aortic Dissections at High- and Low-Volume Centers
Alice L Zhou1, Lekha V Yesantharao2, Eric W Etchill3
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. azhou18@jhmi.edu.
Insights
High-volume centers for type A aortic dissection repair admit more transferred patients and incur higher initial costs, but demonstrate similar mortality and readmission rates compared to low-volume centers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Surgical repair of type A aortic dissection is complex, with outcomes and costs at varying center volumes not fully understood.
- Understanding resource utilization and patient outcomes is crucial for optimizing care delivery for this critical condition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare statewide readmissions, costs, and patient outcomes for type A aortic dissection repairs performed at high-volume versus low-volume centers.
- To analyze the impact of patient transfer status on outcomes and resource utilization within high-volume centers.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing operative repair for type A aortic dissection was conducted using the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database (2012-2020).
- Hospitals were categorized into high-volume (top quartile of repairs) and low-volume centers.
- Patient demographics, severity of illness, transfer status, length of stay, mortality, costs, and readmission rates were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Of 249 patients, 77.5% were treated at high-volume centers, which admitted a greater proportion of transferred patients (71.5% vs. 17.9%).
- High-volume centers had longer lengths of stay (12 vs. 8 days) and significantly higher index admission costs ($114,859 vs. $72,090), with no difference in inpatient mortality (13.0% vs. 16.1%) or readmission rates (54.9% vs. 51.8%).
- Transferred patients at high-volume centers exhibited greater illness severity and resource utilization, but similar mortality and lengths of stay compared to direct admissions.
Conclusions:
- High-volume centers manage a larger volume of transferred type A aortic dissection patients, associated with increased initial resource utilization and costs.
- Despite higher initial resource demands, high-volume centers achieve comparable inpatient mortality and readmission rates to low-volume centers.
- Transfer patients to high-volume centers present with higher illness severity and resource needs, yet experience similar outcomes to direct admissions.
Background:
Costs and readmissions associated with type A aortic dissection repairs are not well understood. We investigated statewide readmissions, costs, and outcomes associated with the surgical management of type A aortic dissection repairs at low- and high-volume centers.
Methods:
We identified all adult type A aortic dissection patients who underwent operative repair in the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission's database (2012-2020). Hospitals were stratified into high- (top quartile of total repairs) or low-volume centers.
Results:
Of the 249 patients included, 193 (77.5%) were treated at a high-volume center. Patients treated at high- and low-volume centers had no differences in age, sex, race, primary payer, or severity (all p > 0.5). High- compared to low-volume centers had a greater proportion of patients transferred in (71.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). High-volume centers also had longer lengths of stay (12 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), similar inpatient mortality (13.0% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.6), and similar proportion of patients readmitted (54.9% vs. 51.8%, p = 0.7). High-volume centers had greater index admission costs ($114,859 vs. $72,090, p < 0.001) and similar readmission costs ($48,367 vs. $42,204, p = 0.5). At high-volume centers, transferred patients compared to direct admissions had greater severity of illness (p = 0.05), similar mortality (p = 0.53), and greater lengths of stay (p = 0.05).
Conclusions:
High-volume centers had a greater number of patients transferred from other institutions compared to low-volume centers. High-volume centers were associated with increased index admission resource utilization, with transfer patients having higher illness severity and greater resource utilization, yet similar mortality, compared to direct admission patients.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

