Outcomes following carotid revascularization for stroke stratified by Modified Rankin Scale and time of intervention
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Yoel Solomon1, Patrick D Conroy2, Vinamr Rastogi2
1Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Insights
Optimal timing for carotid revascularization after stroke depends on severity. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) showed lower stroke/death rates, while delayed intervention reduced risks. Weigh benefits against recurrent stroke risk.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- The optimal timing for carotid revascularization in patients with prior stroke remains unclear.
- Stroke severity, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), may influence outcomes.
- Different revascularization methods (tfCAS, TCAR, CEA) have varying risk profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the optimal timing of carotid revascularization (tfCAS, TCAR, CEA) after stroke.
- To stratify timing by preoperative stroke severity (mRS).
- To compare in-hospital stroke/death rates across intervention methods and timing.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012-2021.
- Patients stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, 5) and time to intervention (≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, 91-180 days).
- Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare in-hospital stroke/death rates.
Main Results:
- Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher in-hospital stroke/death rates across all methods (P < .03).
- Increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (P < .01).
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was associated with lower stroke/death compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) after adjustment.
Conclusions:
- Optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity.
- Higher mRS scores correlate with increased procedural risk.
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) demonstrated superior safety in terms of in-hospital stroke/death rates.
Objectives:
The relationship between baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with prior stroke and optimal timing of carotid revascularization is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the timing of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after prior stroke, stratified by preoperative mRS.
Methods:
We identified patients with recent stroke who underwent tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, or 5) and days from symptom onset to intervention (time to intervention; ≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, and 91-180 days). First, we performed univariate analyses comparing in-hospital outcomes between separate mRS or time-to-intervention cohorts for all carotid intervention methods. Afterward, multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups, and outcomes between the various intervention methods were compared. Primary outcome was the in-hospital stroke/death rate.
Results:
We identified 4260 patients who underwent tfCAS, 3130 patients who underwent TCAR, and 20,012 patients who underwent CEA. Patients were most likely to have minimal disability (mRS, 0-1 [61%]) and least likely to have severe disability (mRS, 5 [1.5%]). Patients most often underwent revascularization in 3 to 14 days (45%). Across all intervention methods, increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death (all P < .03), whereas increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (all P < .01). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, undergoing tfCAS was associated with higher stroke/death compared with undergoing CEA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.9; P < .01) or undergoing TCAR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8; P = .03).
Conclusions:
In patients with preoperative stroke, optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity. Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death rates, whereas increasing time to-intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates. Overall, patients undergoing CEA were associated with lower in-hospital stroke/deaths. To determine benefit for delayed intervention, these results should be weighed against the risk of recurrent stroke during the interval before intervention.
More Related Videos
09:11Performing Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion in Aged Rats to Study Cortical Ischemia with Sustained Disability
Published on: February 23, 2016
04:30A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013