A controlled study of a 'new' ventilating tube. The gold standard?

A prospective controlled study of a gold ventilation tube was undertaken in which a gold tube was inserted in one ear of 88 children and a Paparella silicone tube was inserted in the contralateral ear as a control. The tubes were evaluated with respect to length of time of intubation, episodes of otorrhea and early occlusion. Sixty-three patients were available for a follow-up of at least 6 months. The gold tube remained in place for a shorter period of time when compared to the control tube. Episodes of otorrhea were infrequent and there was not any significant difference between the two types of tubes. The gold tube became occluded more frequently than the control tube. Since the gold tube is approximately 3 times more expensive and has no proven advantages over our conventional silicone tube, we have no reason to recommend its use in preference to any other available tube.