Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Generalisability of trials on antithrombotic treatment intensification in patients with cardiovascular disease
Maria C Castelijns1, Steven H J Hageman1, Martin Teraa2
1Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Insights
Many patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are eligible for intensified antithrombotic treatment trials. Adjusted event risks in these patients largely mirror those not eligible, suggesting guideline recommendations are applicable.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Guideline recommendations for antithrombotic treatment intensification in cardiovascular disease (CVD) are often based on clinical trials.
- The generalisability of these trial findings to real-world patient populations remains a critical consideration for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the real-world eligibility of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) for major antithrombotic treatment trials.
- To compare baseline characteristics, cardiovascular events, bleeding risk, and mortality between eligible and ineligible patients in a real-world cohort.
Main Methods:
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria from key trials (COMPASS, CHARISMA, PEGASUS-TIMI, DAPT) were applied to patients in the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease (UCC-SMART) study.
- Real-world eligibility for intensified antithrombotic treatment was determined.
- Statistical comparisons of outcomes were performed between eligible and ineligible patient groups.
Main Results:
- Real-world eligibility varied significantly across trials, ranging from 11% to 94% for CAD and 75% to 90% for PAD patients.
- COMPASS-eligible CAD patients had higher risks of cardiovascular events, bleeding, and mortality compared to ineligible patients.
- After adjustment, higher cardiovascular and mortality risks persisted for COMPASS-eligible CAD patients, while CHARISMA- and DAPT-eligible CAD patients showed lower cardiovascular risks.
Conclusions:
- A substantial proportion of contemporary patients with CVD meet eligibility criteria for intensified antithrombotic treatment trials.
- Adjusted event risks in eligible real-world patients are mostly similar to those in ineligible patients.
- Trial-based guideline recommendations for antithrombotic therapy appear largely applicable to the broader CVD patient population.
Objective:
Assessment of generalisability of guideline-informing trials on antithrombotic treatment intensification to real-world patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Methods:
Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS), Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and Avoidance (CHARISMA), Prevention of Cardiovascular events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (PEGASUS-TIMI) and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) study were applied to coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients from Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease (UCC-SMART) to determine real-world eligibility. Eligible and ineligible patients were compared on baseline characteristics, cardiovascular events, major bleeding and mortality.
Results:
Eligibility ranged from 11%-94% for CAD to 75%-90% for patients with PAD. Cardiovascular, bleeding and mortality risks were higher in COMPASS-eligible patients with CAD (rate ratios (RR) 1.98 (95% CI 1.74 to 2.26), 2.02 (95% CI 1.47 to 2.78) and 3.11 (95% CI 2.71 to 3.57), respectively) and CHARISMA-eligible patients (RR 1.51 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.06), 2.25 (95% CI 1.01 to 6.21) and 4.43 (95% CI 2.79 to 7.51), respectively), and lower in COMPASS-eligible patients with PAD (RR 0.45 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.56), 0.29 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.46) and 0.45 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.54), respectively) and DAPT-eligible patients with CAD (RR CVD 0.49 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.69) and mortality 0.67 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.94)) than ineligible patients. After adjustment for trial eligibility criteria, only higher cardiovascular and mortality risks in COMPASS-eligible patients with CAD and lower cardiovascular risks in CHARISMA-eligible and DAPT-eligible patients persisted with CAD.
Conclusion:
A large proportion of contemporary CVD patients would be eligible for intensified antithrombotic treatment trials, with mostly similar adjusted event risks to ineligible patients. Trial-based guideline recommendations are largely applicable to real-world patients.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Therapeutic Index

