Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Concept Development and Use of an Automated Food Intake and Eating Behavior Assessment Method
Published on: February 19, 2021
Convergent and discriminant validity of the Minimal Eating Observation Form - version II: a cross-sectional study
Albert Westergren1, David Smithard2,3, Mark Westergaard4
1The PRO-CARE Group and the Research Platform for Collaboration for Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, SE-291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden. Albert.Westergren@hkr.se.
The Minimal Eating Observation Form - Version II (MEOF-II) effectively screens for eating difficulties, aligning with patient experiences and other validated tools. It is a reliable indicator for further dysphagia assessment.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Hearing Sciences
- Gerontology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- The Minimal Eating Observation Form - Version II (MEOF-II) is a validated screening tool for eating difficulties.
- Its psychometric robustness makes it suitable for clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the MEOF-II.
- To compare MEOF-II with other established instruments for dysphagia, activity, and participation.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 100 participants (mean age 72) with conditions like COPD, Parkinson's disease, MS, or stroke.
- Assessed eating ability using MEOF-II, Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI), 4-question test (4QT), Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST), FEES with Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), and Barthel Index (BI).
- Analyzed associations using Spearman's correlation coefficient, hypothesizing moderate correlations for MEOF-II with most measures and weak correlations with PAS and FOIS.
Main Results:
- 78% of participants experienced eating difficulties per MEOF-II.
- MEOF-II total scores showed moderate correlations with DHI, BI, 4QT, and V-VST volume.
- Weak correlations were observed between MEOF-II and V-VST dysphagia/viscosity, PAS, and FOIS, with 83% of hypothesized correlation strengths confirmed.
Conclusions:
- The MEOF-II is a holistic and objective screening tool that aligns with subjective patient experiences.
- It effectively identifies individuals needing further eating difficulty assessment.
- The MEOF-II does not specifically assess penetration or aspiration risk.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Factorial Design
Naturalistic Observations
Self-Report Tests of Personality

