Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Retrieval of cement-retained zirconia implant-supported crowns with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser
Ionut Sebastian Viski1, Jason D Lee2, Rebecca Scialabba3
1Graduate student, Advanced Graduate Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Statement Of Problem:
Cement-retained implant-supported crowns can be challenging to retrieve from the abutment once technical or biological issues arise. Removal traditionally requires sectioning the crown with rotary instruments, which causes irreversible damage to the crown and potential damage to the periodontal apparatus stabilizing the implant.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate an erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser as a minimally invasive alternative for the retrieval of zirconia implant-supported crowns from titanium abutments. Time, temperature, and structural changes to the crown after retrieval were assessed. Appropriate laser parameters were established for this method of crown retrieval.
Material And Methods:
Twenty zirconia crowns were milled for a maxillary left second premolar based on a CAD-CAM implant analog cast. Ten of these crowns were cemented with a noneugenol zinc oxide dental cement (group Temp) (n=10). The remaining 10 were cemented with a self-adhesive universal resin cement (group Resin) (n=10). Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation was performed with the Waterlase iPlus for 1-minute cycles. An attempt was made to remove the crown with a mechanical instrument after each cycle. A type K thermocouple continuously recorded temperature at the level of the abutment. For statistical comparison of decementation time and temperature, the Mann-Whitney test was used (α=.05). Scanning electron microscopy of the nonirradiated and the irradiated crowns was used for analysis of structural and dimensional changes.
Results:
A significant difference (P<.001) was found in the time ±standard deviation required to retrieve the crowns between group Temp (02:40 ±00:18 minutes:seconds) and group Resin (05:26 ±00:36 minutes:seconds). A significant difference (P<.001) was found in the mean ±standard deviation temperature recorded between group Temp (24.0 ±1.19 °C) and group Resin (25.7 ±0.66 °C). No structural changes to crowns were observed after irradiation.
Conclusions:
Retrieval of cement-retained zirconia implant-supported crowns with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser is safe and efficient. Crowns luted with zinc oxide dental cement were retrieved significantly faster while maintaining a significantly lower average temperature than those luted with resin cement. Laser irradiation for decementation did not cause structural changes to zirconia implant-supported crowns.
