Assessing deep convolutional neural network models and their comparative performance for automated medicinal plant...

Medicinal plants have got notable attention in recent years in the field of pharmaceutical and drug research. The high demand of herbal medicine in the rural areas of developing countries and drug industries necessitates correct identification of the medicinal plant species which is challenging in absence of expert taxonomic knowledge. Against this backdrop, we attempted to assess the performance of seven advanced deep learning algorithms in the automated identification of the plants from their leaf images and to suggest the best model from a comparative study of the models. We meticulously trained VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet201, ResNet50V2, Xception, InceptionResNetV2, and InceptionV3 deep neural network models. This training utilized a dataset comprising 5878 images encompassing 30 medicinal species distributed among 20 families. Our approach involved two avenues: the utilization of public data (P_I) and a blend of public and field data (PF_I), the latter featuring intricate backgrounds. Our study elucidates the robustness of these models in accurately identifying and classifying both interfamily and interspecies variations. Despite variations in accuracy across diverse families and species, the models demonstrated adeptness in these classifications. Comparing the models, we unearthed a crucial insight: the Normalized leverage factor ($$) for DenseNet201 stands at 0.19, elevating it to the pinnacle position for P_I with a remarkable 99.64 % accuracy and 98.31 % precision. In the PF_I scenario, the same model achieves a $$ of 0.15 with a commendable 97 % accuracy. These findings serve as a guiding beacon for shaping future application tools designed to automate medicinal plant identification at the user level.