Synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft: Four case reports

Faisal Khader AlGhamdi1, Abdulmajeed Altoijry2, Abdulrahman AlQahtani3

  • 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh 11322, Saudi Arabia. falghamdi3@ksu.edu.sa.

PubMed

Insights

Synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a safe option for patients with significant carotid stenosis (CS). This case series suggests combined procedures can effectively manage high-risk patients, reducing stroke risk during CABG.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Neurosurgery
  • Vascular Surgery

Background:

  • Stroke is a major perioperative risk following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, affecting approximately 2% of patients.
  • Carotid stenosis (CS) is a significant independent predictor of perioperative stroke in CABG patients.
  • Optimal management of CS in CABG candidates remains controversial, with synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG being a potential surgical approach.

Observation:

  • This report details four cases of patients with significant carotid artery stenosis undergoing combined CEA and CABG.
  • Patient 1: Female with left internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (90%) and right ICA occlusion undergoing CABG post-myocardial infarction.
  • Patient 2: Male with right ICA stenosis (90%) and left ICA occlusion undergoing elective CABG.
  • Patient 3: Male with right ICA stenosis (>90%) undergoing CABG post-stroke and myocardial infarction.
  • Patient 4: Male with bilateral ICA stenosis (>90%) undergoing elective CABG.

Findings:

  • The synchronous CEA and CABG procedure was successfully performed in all four presented cases.
  • The case series indicates that combined CEA and CABG is a safe and feasible option for managing patients with critical CS undergoing CABG.
  • Current evidence and guidelines for managing CS in CABG patients were reviewed.

Implications:

  • This case series suggests synchronous CEA and CABG is a safe procedure.
  • Further multicenter studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.
  • Clinicians should consider screening high-risk patients for CS to optimize perioperative management and outcomes.
Abstract