Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Creation of Two Saccular Elastase-Digested Aneurysms with Different Hemodynamics in One Rabbit
Published on: April 15, 2021
Synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft: Four case reports
Faisal Khader AlGhamdi1, Abdulmajeed Altoijry2, Abdulrahman AlQahtani3
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh 11322, Saudi Arabia. falghamdi3@ksu.edu.sa.
Insights
Synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a safe option for patients with significant carotid stenosis (CS). This case series suggests combined procedures can effectively manage high-risk patients, reducing stroke risk during CABG.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Stroke is a major perioperative risk following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, affecting approximately 2% of patients.
- Carotid stenosis (CS) is a significant independent predictor of perioperative stroke in CABG patients.
- Optimal management of CS in CABG candidates remains controversial, with synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG being a potential surgical approach.
Observation:
- This report details four cases of patients with significant carotid artery stenosis undergoing combined CEA and CABG.
- Patient 1: Female with left internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (90%) and right ICA occlusion undergoing CABG post-myocardial infarction.
- Patient 2: Male with right ICA stenosis (90%) and left ICA occlusion undergoing elective CABG.
- Patient 3: Male with right ICA stenosis (>90%) undergoing CABG post-stroke and myocardial infarction.
- Patient 4: Male with bilateral ICA stenosis (>90%) undergoing elective CABG.
Findings:
- The synchronous CEA and CABG procedure was successfully performed in all four presented cases.
- The case series indicates that combined CEA and CABG is a safe and feasible option for managing patients with critical CS undergoing CABG.
- Current evidence and guidelines for managing CS in CABG patients were reviewed.
Implications:
- This case series suggests synchronous CEA and CABG is a safe procedure.
- Further multicenter studies with larger patient cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.
- Clinicians should consider screening high-risk patients for CS to optimize perioperative management and outcomes.
Background:
One of the major perioperative complications for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is stroke. The risk of perioperative stroke after CABG is approximately 2%. Carotid stenosis (CS) is considered an independent predictor of perioperative stroke risk in CABG patients. The optimal management of such patients has been a source of controversy. One of the possible surgical options is synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG. Here, we have presented 4 cases of successful synchronous CEA and CABG.
Case Summary:
Our center's experience with 4 cases of significant carotid artery stenosis, which were successfully managed with combined CEA and CABG, are detailed. The first case was a female who presented for CABG after a ST-elevation myocardial infarction. She had right internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion and 90% left ICA stenosis. The second case was a male who was electively admitted for CABG. It was discovered that he had left ICA occlusion and 90% right ICA stenosis. The third case was a male with a history of stroke, two months prior to admission. He presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Preoperatively, it was discovered that he had > 90% right ICA stenosis. The final case was a male who was electively admitted for CABG. It was discovered that he had bilateral > 90% ICA stenosis. We have also reviewed the current evidence and guidelines for managing CS in patients undergoing CABG.
Conclusion:
Our case series demonstrated that synchronous CEA and CABG was safe. A multicenter study with additional patients is needed. It is necessary for clinicians to screen for CS in high-risk patients with features.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

