Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Expressions for Bayesian confidence of drift diffusion observers in fluctuating stimuli tasks
Joshua Calder-Travis1, Rafal Bogacz2, Nick Yeung1
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.
This study presents a computationally efficient method for modeling decision confidence, accounting for stimulus variability. The new approach enables more feasible trial-by-trial analysis of confidence in complex decision-making tasks.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Science
- Computational Neuroscience
- Decision Science
Background:
- Decision confidence modeling is crucial for understanding cognitive processes.
- Existing models face challenges with trial-by-trial variability in fluctuating stimuli.
- Computational efficiency is key for practical application in complex tasks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a computationally cheap approach for modeling decision confidence.
- To incorporate trial-by-trial variability in stochastically fluctuating stimuli.
- To derive practical expressions for confidence distributions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the drift diffusion model framework with time-dependent thresholds.
- Incorporated a Bayesian confidence readout and pipeline evidence accumulation.
- Derived expressions for confidence distributions with normally-distributed stimulus fluctuations.
Main Results:
- Developed novel expressions for confidence probability distributions.
- Accounted for drift rate variability and metacognitive noise.
- Validated approximations through simulations, showing feasibility for trial-by-trial analysis.
Conclusions:
- The derived expressions offer a computationally feasible method for modeling decision confidence.
- This approach enhances understanding of confidence in tasks with fluctuating stimuli.
- Provides insights into optimal observer confidence and empirical patterns.
More Related Videos
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Confidence Coefficient
Confidence Intervals
A...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Genetic Drift