Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.4K
Electron Affinity03:07

Electron Affinity

35.5K
The electron affinity (EA) is the energy change for adding an electron to a gaseous atom to form an anion (negative ion).
35.5K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.8K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.8K
Positive, Negative, and Zero Work00:58

Positive, Negative, and Zero Work

18.9K
Work is done on an object when energy is transferred to the object. In other words, work is done when a force acts on a body that undergoes a displacement from one position to another. By definition, the work done by a force is the integral of the force with respect to the displacement along its path. Forces can vary as a function of position, and displacements can occur along various paths between two points. The magnitude of a force multiplied by the cosine of the angle that the force makes...
18.9K
Affinity and Avidity01:41

Affinity and Avidity

36.1K
Overview
36.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.0K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PLM-effector: unleashing the potential of protein language models for bacterial secreted protein prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Long-Term Trends and Determinants of Tuberculosis Burden in China, 1990-2023: Insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Deep Learning for Video Anomaly Detection: A Review.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same author

Unsupervised Recognition of Unknown Objects for Open-World Object Detection.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2025
Same author

CoLeCLIP: Open-Domain Continual Learning via Joint Task Prompt and Vocabulary Learning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2025
Same author

Harnessing collective structure knowledge in data augmentation for graph neural networks.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2024
Same journal

Granular Ball-Based Noise-Resistant Fuzzy Multineighborhood Feature Selection via Label Enhancement and Feature Graph.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Fighting Evolving Spam With ARTMAP Models: A Noise-Resilient Online Detection Framework.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

HyperSAT: Unsupervised Hypergraph Neural Networks for Weighted MaxSAT Problems.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Negation of Basic Belief Assignment in Multisource Information Fusion on Dempster-Shafer Theory With Applications in Pattern Classification.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

Intervention Feasible Region and Driver Risk Capacity Aware Human-Machine Collaborative Safe Trajectory Planning.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same journal

A Unified Differential Denoising Learning Framework With a Pre-Trained Model and Fuzzy Graph Networks for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
12:11

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization

Published on: February 27, 2020

6.9K

Affinity Uncertainty-Based Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive Learning.

Chaoxi Niu, Guansong Pang, Ling Chen

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |January 8, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a new method for graph contrastive learning (GCL) that accurately identifies hard negative examples by analyzing collective affinity information. This approach enhances GCL performance and robustness against adversarial attacks.

    More Related Videos

    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
    06:58

    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

    Published on: February 7, 2025

    561
    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
    03:31

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    556

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

    Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
    12:11

    Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization

    Published on: February 27, 2020

    6.9K
    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice
    06:58

    Behavioral Tasks for Examining Identity Recognition In Mice

    Published on: February 7, 2025

    561
    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
    03:31

    Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

    Published on: December 15, 2023

    556

    Area of Science:

    • Graph Machine Learning
    • Self-Supervised Learning
    • Representation Learning

    Background:

    • Hard negative mining improves contrastive learning (CL), including graph CL (GCL).
    • Existing methods struggle with graph data due to oversmoothing and non-i.i.d. issues, leading to false negatives.
    • Current hardness-aware CL methods often fail to correctly identify hard negatives in graph data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel approach for mining hard negatives in GCL by utilizing collective affinity information.
    • To enhance existing GCL methods by incorporating uncertainty information into loss functions.
    • To improve the discriminative power of graph representations.

    Main Methods:

    • A discriminative model is built on collective affinity information (pairwise affinities between anchor and negative instances).
    • Model confidence/uncertainty regarding negative instance affinity determines hardness weights.
    • Uncertainty information is integrated into GCL loss functions as a weighting term.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed approach consistently enhances state-of-the-art GCL methods on ten graph datasets.
    • Significant improvements were observed in both graph and node classification tasks.
    • The method notably boosts the robustness of GCL against adversarial attacks.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel approach effectively addresses the challenge of hard negative mining in GCL.
    • Incorporating uncertainty-based hardness weights leads to improved GCL performance and robustness.
    • The enhanced GCL loss is theoretically linked to a triplet loss with an adaptive margin.