Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

09:03
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
5.8K
Increasing the public awareness of justification
1Visiting Research Fellow, Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
Summary
UK law requires medical radiation exposures to be justified, ensuring benefits outweigh risks. This article advocates for increased patient awareness of this legal protection, emphasizing justification as a primary ethical and legal principle.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiological Protection
- Health Law
Background:
- The UK Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 mandate justification for all medical radiation exposures.
- Justification requires a formal assessment that medical benefits exceed radiation detriment.
- This legal framework for net benefit in medical radiation is unique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the legal requirement for justification in medical radiation exposures in the UK.
- To argue for enhanced public and patient awareness of existing legal protections.
- To propose a simplified communication strategy for the principle of justification.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the UK Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017.
- Review of ethical principles related to medical benefit and detriment.
- Development of a communication strategy for public awareness.
Main Results:
- Justification is a primary legal and ethical prerequisite for medical radiation exposure.
- Informed consent, while crucial, follows the principle of justification.
- Current legal provisions offer significant patient protection.
Conclusions:
- Increased public and patient understanding of justification is needed.
- A clear, concise statement on justification can improve awareness.
- The principle of justification aligns with fundamental medical ethics.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Bystander Effect
9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K

