Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Progress toward a more ethical method for clinical trials.

J B Kadane

    The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
    |November 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Bayesian demography: projecting the Iraqi Kurdish population, 1977-1990.

    Journal of the American Statistical Association·2002
    Same author

    Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials.

    Biometrics·1998
    Same author

    Prime time for Bayes.

    Controlled clinical trials·1995
    Same author

    Bayesian statistical methods in public health and medicine.

    Annual review of public health·1995
    Same author

    Adjusting the 1980 census of population and housing.

    Journal of the American Statistical Association·1989
    Same author

    Using administrative lists to estimate census omissions.

    Journal of official statistics·1986

    This study introduces a novel clinical trial method using Bayesian technology to update expert opinions, aiming to improve treatment assignment. This approach ensures only treatments deemed best by experts are assigned to patients.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical trial methodology
    • Bayesian statistical methods
    • Medical ethics

    Background:

    • Current clinical trial methods, particularly randomization, face ethical challenges.
    • The need for adaptive and ethically sound clinical trial designs is growing.
    • Existing methodologies may not fully leverage expert knowledge dynamically.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore a new clinical trial methodology beyond traditional randomization.
    • To investigate the use of Bayesian technology for expert opinion elicitation and updating.
    • To assess the ethical and statistical implications of assigning only 'admissible' treatments.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizes Bayesian technology to elicit and store expert opinions on treatments.
    • Expert opinions are conditioned on patient-specific predictor variables.
    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Opinions are dynamically updated using accumulating trial data within a computer model.

    • Main Results:

    • Proposes a principle where only treatments considered 'best' by at least one expert are admissible for assignment.
    • Explores the ethical and statistical consequences of this admissibility principle.
    • Reports initial experience from a clinical trial at Johns Hopkins utilizing this novel design.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed Bayesian-driven method offers a flexible alternative to fixed clinical trial designs.
    • This approach allows for dynamic adaptation of treatment assignment based on expert consensus and incoming data.
    • Further evaluation of ethical and statistical outcomes is warranted for this innovative clinical trial methodology.