Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

09:07
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
7.6K
The articular surface technique for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a 3D feasibility study
Gautham Prabhakar1, Trevor Wait1, Aaron Kolar1
1Department of Orthopedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Journal of Spine Surgery (Hong Kong)
|January 10, 2024
Summary
A new articular surface technique (AST) for lumbar spine fusion offers a viable alternative to traditional pedicle screws. This method may be better suited for lower lumbar fusions (L3-S1) due to bone density variations.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic biomechanics
- Surgical technique innovation
Background:
- Traditional pedicle screws (TPSs) and cortical-based trajectory screws offer lumbar spine fusion stability but have unique failure risks.
- Existing techniques face complications like loosening and failure due to technical limitations.
- A novel pedicle screw placement technique through the vertebral superior articular surface is proposed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a new pedicle screw trajectory through the articular surface for lumbar spinal fusion.
- To determine if this technique allows for larger screw utilization and maintains bone density.
- To compare the proposed technique with traditional methods regarding screw size and bone engagement.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 50 lumbar CT scans from trauma patients (age 18-45).
- Virtual pedicle screw placement (L1-S1) using Brainlab software, mapping trajectories through the superior facet and pedicle.
- Assessment of screw parameters: medial angle <10°, length ≥30 mm, width ≥5.0 mm, and starting point measurements.
Main Results:
- 600 virtual screws placed; 525 (87.5%) were satisfactory.
- Pedicle width significantly increases in lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-S1).
- 72% of unsuccessful screw placements occurred in L1-L2, indicating suitability for lower levels.
Conclusions:
- The articular surface technique (AST) is a viable alternative for lumbar spinal fusion.
- AST potentially reduces soft tissue dissection compared to traditional methods.
- The technique appears most suitable for lower lumbar levels (L3-S1).

