Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The interplay of habitat quality and temperature shape demographic patterns of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in North America.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Integrating climate and anthropogenic dynamics can inform multifaceted management for declining mule deer populations.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026
Same author

Rapid butterfly declines across the United States during the 21st century.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.

Movement ecology·2024
Same author

Direct Determination of Fission-Barrier Heights Using Light-Ion Transfer in Inverse Kinematics.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Recent and future declines of a historically widespread pollinator linked to climate, land cover, and pesticides.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.0K

Quantifying effectiveness and best practices for bumblebee identification from photographs.

A M Colgan1, R G Hatfield2, A Dolan3

  • 1U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 38 Mather Drive, West Glacier, MT 59936, USA.

Scientific Reports
|January 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Photographic identification of bumblebees shows high accuracy, comparable to specimen identification, aiding conservation efforts for declining species. This method offers a less impactful way to collect crucial pollinator data.

More Related Videos

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee Bombus Hive Entrances
07:19

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee Bombus Hive Entrances

Published on: July 9, 2020

5.4K
Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies
08:11

Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies

Published on: January 19, 2021

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.0K
A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee Bombus Hive Entrances
07:19

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee Bombus Hive Entrances

Published on: July 9, 2020

5.4K
Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies
08:11

Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies

Published on: January 19, 2021

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Entomology
  • Conservation Biology

Background:

  • Accurate species-level data is essential for understanding pollinator networks.
  • Declining bumblebee populations necessitate efficient and minimally invasive data collection methods.
  • Photographic identification offers a promising alternative to traditional specimen collection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of photographic identification for bumblebee species.
  • To compare the accuracy of photographic identification with traditional specimen identification.
  • To identify factors influencing the accuracy of photographic bee identification.

Main Methods:

  • Blind photographic identification of 1418 bumblebees, with 561 having paired specimens.
  • Identification performed by minimally trained individuals, with expert verification.
  • Analysis of agreement between photograph and specimen identifications.

Main Results:

  • Expert photographic identification accuracy was 92.4%, compared to 98.2% for specimens.
  • Misidentification rates were similar: 2.7% for photographs and 2.5% for specimens.
  • Factors reducing photograph identifiability included wet/matted bees, poor image quality, tablet use, and species with multiple color morphs.

Conclusions:

  • Photographic identification is a viable, accurate method for bumblebee species identification, with accuracy comparable to specimen-based methods.
  • Strategies to enhance accuracy include developing identification rulesets and targeted training.
  • This approach can support conservation by reducing impacts on vulnerable bumblebee populations.