Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2025

04:55
Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
10.8K
Pediatric invasive device utility and harm: a multi-site point prevalence survey
Mari Takashima1,2, Victoria Gibson3,4, Eloise Borello5
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. m.takashima@uq.edu.au.
Pediatric Research
|January 10, 2024
Summary
Pediatric patients frequently use invasive devices, with nearly 80% requiring them. A significant number of these devices, particularly vascular access devices, experienced complications or failure, highlighting the need for improved safety strategies.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Healthcare
- Medical Device Safety
- Hospital-Acquired Complications
Background:
- Invasive devices are essential in healthcare but pose risks, especially to vulnerable pediatric populations.
- This study addresses the critical need to understand invasive device use and associated harms in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence, utility, and complications of invasive devices in Australian pediatric tertiary hospitals.
- To analyze clinical practices related to invasive device management and removal in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- A multi-center, observational, rolling-point-prevalence survey was conducted in 2022-2023.
- Inpatients were randomly sampled, and patients with devices were followed for up to 3 days.
- Data collected included device-related complications, failures, and management characteristics.
Main Results:
- 78.2% of 285 audited pediatric patients had at least one invasive device (412 total devices).
- Vascular access devices (54.1%) and gastrointestinal devices (27.2%) were most common.
- Point prevalence of device complications was 10.7% on Day 0, rising to 27.7% over the audit period, with a 13.4% device failure rate.
Conclusions:
- A high prevalence of invasive devices necessitates vigilant monitoring in pediatric settings.
- One-in-ten devices failed during the audit period, indicating potential for harm.
- Improved strategies are crucial to minimize complications and enhance the safety of invasive devices for children.

