Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Stereotactic Adoptive Transfer of Cytotoxic Immune Cells in Murine Models of Orthotopic Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts
Published on: September 1, 2018
Limited Effects of Class II Transactivator-Based Immunotherapy in Murine and Human Glioblastoma
A Katherine Tan1, Aurelie Henry2, Nicolas Goffart2
1Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) Brain Center, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background:
The major histocompatibility complex type II is downregulated in glioblastoma (GB) due to the silencing of the major transcriptional regulator class II transactivator (CIITA). We investigated the pro-immunogenic potential of CIITA overexpression in mouse and human GB.
Methods:
The intracerebral growth of wildtype GL261-WT cells was assessed following contralateral injection of GL261-CIITA cells or flank injections with GL261-WT or GL261-CIITA cells. Splenocytes obtained from mice implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT, GL261-CIITA cells or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were transferred to other mice and subsequently implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT. Human GB cells and (syngeneic) GB-infiltrating immune cells were isolated from surgical samples and co-cultured with GB cells expressing CIITA or not, followed by RT-qPCR assessment of the expression of key immune regulators.
Results:
Intracerebral vaccination of GL261-CIITA significantly reduced the subsequent growth of GL261-WT cells implanted contralaterally. Vaccination with GL261-WT or -CIITA subcutaneously, however, equivalently retarded the intracerebral growth of GL261 cells. Adoptive cell transfer experiments showed a similar antitumor potential of lymphocytes harvested from mice implanted intracerebrally with GL261-WT or -CIITA. Human GB-infiltrating myeloid cells and lymphocytes were not activated when cultured with CIITA-expressing GB cells. Tumor-infiltrating NK cells remained mostly inactivated when in co-culture with GB cells, regardless of CIITA.
Conclusion:
these results question the therapeutic potential of CIITA-mediated immunotherapy in glioblastoma.

