PULMOEAST: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pulmonary Hypertension in Eastern India

Background Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a debilitating cardiovascular disorder characterized by abnormally elevated blood pressure within the lungs. The diverse range of causes and varied clinical presentations contribute to the complexity of its diagnosis and management. In eastern India and surrounding areas, awareness of PH remains limited, and resources for its management are scarce. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by investigating clinical characteristics and treatment approaches adopted for PH patients in eastern India. Methods This retrospective-prospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with PH, defined by a pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) > 50 mmHg or a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg, between July 2015 and October 2023. Data retrieved from hospital records formed the retrospective cohort, while the prospective cohort comprised patients directly recruited for the study. Results The PULMOEAST study enrolled 93 patients with confirmed PH, divided into prospective (59 patients) and retrospective (34 patients) cohorts. The most prevalent cause of PH was congenital heart disease (CHD), with shunt lesions (59.13%), followed by complex CHD (13.97%) and idiopathic PH (20.43%). Six additional patients presented with rare causes of PH, and three experienced transient PH following atrial septal defect device closure. Geographic distribution revealed that 72.04% of patients originated from eastern India, while 18.27% hail from other eastern states and 8.6% from neighboring countries. Patients exhibited varying functional classes (FC), with 57 classified as FC-II and 31 classified as FC-III. Treatment strategies primarily involve supportive medications and pulmonary vasodilators. Monotherapy was administered to 26 patients (27.95%), dual therapy to 50 patients (53.76%), and triple therapy to one patient. Notably, 16 patients did not receive any vasodilator therapy as they were waiting for further evaluation. Among the vasodilator regimen, two patients received Selexipag. Three patients underwent intervention for shunt lesion closure, including one patient who received a fenestrated atrial septal occluder implant. Additionally, one patient underwent clot removal for pulmonary thromboembolism. Despite the overall positive response to treatment, the study recorded eight fatalities (8.6%) during the observation period. However, most patients exhibited significant improvement, including a decrease in functional class, during a mean follow-up duration of 14.31 months. Conclusion The PULMOEAST study undertook a comprehensive exploration of PH in eastern India and surrounding regions, revealing a stark dominance of CHD as the primary culprit. The study confirmed the pivotal role of echocardiography as a readily available and effective tool for both initial and follow-up evaluations in resource-scarce settings. It painted a hopeful picture by showcasing significant clinical improvement in most treated patients, with supportive medications and pulmonary vasodilators playing a crucial role. However, the diverse etiologies, limited access to PH-specific resources, and lack of widespread awareness within the region continue to pose substantial challenges for patients. The study underscores the need for refined diagnostic approaches, cost-effective management strategies, collaborative care initiatives, and enhanced patient education to optimize PH care and improve outcomes in eastern India.