Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Cellular Processes by Modeling Ligands in Cryo-EM Maps
Published on: July 19, 2024
Thermodynamically Optimized Machine-Learned Reaction Coordinates for Hydrophobic Ligand Dissociation
Eric R Beyerle1, Pratyush Tiwary1,2
1Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.
Entropy dominates the free-energy barrier for hydrophobic ligand unbinding. A deep learning model reveals distinct solvation and wetting mechanisms for methane and fullerene dissociation from binding pockets.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry and biophysics
- Molecular dynamics and free energy calculations
- Machine learning applications in thermodynamics
Background:
- Ligand unbinding free energy is a crucial determinant of molecular interactions.
- Quantifying individual entropic and enthalpic contributions to unbinding free energy is challenging.
- Hydrophobic interactions play a significant role in ligand binding and dissociation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a deep learning framework for modeling hydrophobic ligand unbinding.
- To identify and analyze the thermodynamic contributions (entropy and enthalpy) to the unbinding free energy profile.
- To elucidate the specific mechanisms of unbinding for different sized hydrophobic ligands (methane and C60 fullerene).
Main Methods:
- Utilized a modified deep learning framework to learn a thermodynamically optimized reaction coordinate.
- Modeled all-atom simulations of methane and C60 fullerene unbinding from hydrophobic pockets in water.
- Performed feature importance analysis on the learned reaction coordinates to interpret thermodynamic forces.
Main Results:
- The free-energy barrier for both methane and C60 fullerene unbinding is primarily governed by entropic factors.
- Methane unbinding is driven by methane solvation, while fullerene unbinding involves pocket wetting followed by fullerene wetting.
- The learned reaction coordinate indicates a low direct importance of simple distance from the binding pocket.
Conclusions:
- The developed deep learning approach provides valuable thermodynamic insights into hydrophobic ligand dissociation.
- Entropy plays a dominant role in the free-energy barriers of hydrophobic ligand unbinding.
- Distinct solvation and wetting mechanisms characterize the unbinding pathways of small versus large hydrophobic ligands.
More Related Videos
10:33Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
Published on: October 26, 2015
13:26Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
Published on: September 13, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Complexation Equilibria: Overview
The equilibrium constant of the complexation reaction is represented as the formation constant...
Drug-Receptor Bonds
In...