Electromyographic biofeedback therapy for improving limb function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Rui Wang1,2, Shuangshuang Zhang2, Jie Zhang2
1Department of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Background:
Upper and lower limb impairment is common after stroke. Electromyographic biofeedback therapy is a non-invasive treatment, and its effectiveness in functional rehabilitation of the limb after stroke still remains uncertain.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether electromyographic biofeedback can improve upper and lower limb dysfunction in stroke patients.
Methods:
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched from inception to 1st May 2022. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled clinical trials of electromyographic biofeedback therapy interventions reporting changes in upper and lower limb function in post-stroke patients. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and pooled in random-effects models using Review manager (RevMan) software.
Results:
Our analyses included 10 studies enrolling a total of 303 participants. Electromyographic biofeedback therapy can effectively improve limb function after stroke (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.77; P = 0.008) and in subgroup analyses, the effect sizes of short-term effect (SMD, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.02-0.64; P = 0.04) was significant, but the long-term was not (SMD, 0.61; 95% CI, -0.11-1.33; P = 0.10). In addition, Electromyographic biofeedback therapy can improve the active range of motion of shoulder (SMD, 1.49; 95% CI, 2.22; P<0.0001) and wrist joints (SMD, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.13-1.42; P = 0.02) after stroke.
Conclusion:
In this meta-analysis, electromyographic biofeedback therapy intervention can improve upper and lower limb function in patients with stroke. Short-term (less than one month) improvement after electromyographic biofeedback therapy was supported, while evidence for long-term (more than one month) benefits was lacking. Range of motion in the glenohumeral and wrist joints were improved. Stronger evidence for individualized parameters, such as optimal treatment parameters and intervention period, is needed in the future.
Systematic Review Registration:
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?recordID=267596], identifier [CRD42022354363].
More Related Videos
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
09:42Author Spotlight: Using Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface to Improve Motor and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients
Published on: September 1, 2023
