Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Purposive Learning

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

Metacognition

Metacognition

Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Rational contractualist solutions are not perceived as moral.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Technology mediation in child sexual exploitation and abuse in Africa and Asia.

Nature·2026

Same author

Forgetting as an active process: Attentional withdrawal following a forget instruction.

Memory & cognition·2025

Same author

General knowledge and detailed memory benefit from different training sequences.

Journal of applied research in memory and cognition·2025

Same author

Why Empirical Forgetting Curves Deviate from Actual Forgetting Rates: A Distribution Model of Forgetting.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Perceived value of video games, but not hours played, predicts mental well-being in casual adult Nintendo players.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same journal

How teacher behaviour in student-teacher dyads relates to boys' and girls' mathematics anxiety. An investigation of interpersonal profiles.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026

Same journal

Decoding reading comprehension from eye movements in narrative and expository texts: A keyword- and whole-text-level comparison.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026

Same journal

Are teachers' knowledge of dyslexia, perceived teaching ability and warmth during teaching related to Chinese students' reading development?

The British journal of educational psychology·2026

Same journal

"Just put them in a group?" Teaching cooperation in childhood: Behavioural effects of a structured, tech-supported intervention.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026

Same journal

Promoting student well-being in schools: Intervention effects and the role of student-student relationships and intrinsic motivation.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026

Same journal

Predictive and interactive roles of motivation and situational learning activities on emotional and cognitive engagement.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Learning from errors versus explicit instruction in preparation for a test that counts.

Janet Metcalfe¹, Judy Xu¹, Matti Vuorre²

¹Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

The British Journal of Educational Psychology

|January 11, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Learning from errors can be beneficial when students actively engage with their mistakes. Interactive feedback focusing on error analysis, rather than just corrections, enhances learning more effectively than explicit instruction.

Keywords:

discovery learning interactive feedback learning from errors productive failure test effects

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Area of Science:

Educational Psychology
Cognitive Science
Pedagogy

Background:

Traditionally, errors were seen as detrimental to learning.
Recent research suggests errors can enhance learning under specific feedback conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate teaching strategies that optimize learning from errors.
To compare learning-from-errors (LFE) with explicit instruction (EI).

Main Methods:

A 2-year study with two student cohorts (~88 each).
Contrasted LFE (mini-tests, error-focused feedback) with EI (direct instruction).
Focus on improving performance on the NYS Algebra 1 Regents exam.

Main Results:

LFE teaching strategies yielded higher learning rates than EI.
Interactive engagement with errors proved more effective than direct correction.
Learning benefits varied across teachers, highlighting the importance of teaching style.

Conclusions:

Interactive focus on errors and their causes promotes productive failure.
Engaging students in understanding their mistakes is key to effective learning from errors.