Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025
Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components
Published on: January 11, 2019
Comparative analysis of flexural strength of 3D printed and milled 4Y-TZP and 3Y-TZP zirconia
Kyu-Young Kyung1, Ji-Man Park2, Seong-Joo Heo3
1PhD Candidate, Department of Prosthodontics & Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Republic of Korea.
Statement Of Problem:
The mechanical properties of 3 dimensionally (3D) printed zirconia have been reported to be comparable with those of milled zirconia, except for the flexural strength. However, most previous studies tested 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP), making it necessary to study 3D printed zirconia with 4 mol% yttria content (4Y-TZP).
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the flexural strength of 3D printed 4Y-TZP with 3Y-TZP materials and milled 4Y-TZP.
Material And Methods:
A total of 80 disk specimens (Ø15×1.5 mm) were fabricated and divided into 4 groups (n=20) using the fabrication method and yttria content: milled 3Y-TZP (Katana HT; Kuraray Noritake), 3D printed 3Y-TZP (TZ-3Y-E; Tosoh), milled 4Y-TZP (Katana STML; Kuraray Noritake), and 3D printed 4Y-TZP (3DMAT; Genoss). The biaxial flexural strength was determined with a piston-on-3-ball test (n=15). The flexural strength of each specimen was measured, and the Weibull modulus (m) and characteristic strength (σ0) were estimated from the fracture load distribution. Two intact and fractured specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crystalline phase of the specimens in each group was identified through X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (n=5). A 1-way ANOVA was used to compare the flexural strength among different groups. Subsequently, pairwise comparisons were conducted with the Tukey post hoc method (α=.05).
Results:
The flexural strength of 3D printed 4Y-TZP was significantly higher than that of milled 4Y-TZP (P<.001). In contrast, the flexural strength of 3D printed 3Y-TZP was significantly lower than that of milled 3Y-TZP (P<.001). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed that the tetragonal phase was the dominant phase in all groups, with the identification of some cubic phase peaks.
Conclusions:
Three dimensionally printed 4Y-TZP showed significantly higher flexural strength than milled 4Y-TZP and exhibited a clinically acceptable flexural strength exceeding 800 MPa.
More Related Videos
08:29Multi-material Ceramic-Based Components – Additive Manufacturing of Black-and-white Zirconia Components by Thermoplastic 3D-Printing (CerAM - T3DP)
Published on: January 7, 2019
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
