Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and
Jayakumar Sreenivasan1, Rohin K Reddy2, Yasser Jamil1
1Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Yale University School of Medicine New Haven CT USA.
Intravascular imaging significantly reduces major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). These findings support its use as a standard of care in PCI procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Interventional cardiology
- Medical imaging
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure, but optimal guidance remains debated.
- Intravascular imaging (IVI) offers detailed views of coronary anatomy, potentially improving PCI outcomes compared to standard angiography.
- Despite evidence, IVI adoption in PCI guidance is suboptimal.
Approach:
- An updated, study-level meta-analysis was conducted, pooling data from 16 randomized trials involving 7814 patients undergoing PCI.
- The analysis followed an intention-to-treat principle, assessing major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, and all-cause death as primary outcomes.
- Mixed-effects meta-regression explored the influence of complex PCI on clinical outcomes.
Key Points:
- Intravascular imaging guidance significantly lowered the risk of MACE (RR 0.67), cardiac death (RR 0.49), stent thrombosis (RR 0.63), target-lesion revascularization (RR 0.67), and target-vessel revascularization (RR 0.60).
- Benefits were consistent across all included studies, indicating a large and reliable effect.
- While not statistically significant (P=0.07), a trend towards reduced all-cause mortality was observed in complex PCI subsets.
Conclusions:
- Intravascular imaging guidance in PCI is associated with significant reductions in key adverse cardiovascular events and mortality.
- The benefits are substantial and consistent, supporting its integration into routine clinical practice.
- These findings advocate for the routine use of intravascular imaging as a standard of care and for guideline updates.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

