Comparing brute force to transition path sampling for gas hydrate nucleation with a flat interface: comments on time...

Fluid to solid nucleation is often investigated with the rare event method transition path sampling (TPS). I claim that the inherent irreversibility of solid nucleation, even at stationary conditions, calls into question TPS's applicability for determining solid nucleation mechanisms, especially for pre-critical behavior. Even when applied to a phenomenon which displays time reversal asymmetry like solid nucleation, TPS is a good means of exploring phase space and giving trends in post-critical structure, and its ability to facilitate nucleation rate and free energy calculations remains outstanding. Forward-only splitting and ratcheting methods such as forward flux sampling are more attractive for understanding nucleation mechanisms as they do not require time reversal symmetry, but at low driving forces may suffer from the same limitations as brute force: they may never make it to the first ratchet. Here I briefly summarize the TPS method and gas hydrate nucleation simulation literature, focusing on topics within both to facilitate a comparison of brute force hydrate nucleation to transition path sampling of hydrate nucleation. Perhaps anecdotally, the brute force technique results in more crystalline trajectories despite having higher driving forces than TPS. I maintain this difference is because of the inherent irreversibility of hydrate nucleation, meaning its pre-critical behavior cannot accurately be determined by the melting trajectories that comprise approximately half of the configurations in TPS's path ensemble.