Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
The impact of uncertainty on predictions of the CovidSim epidemiological code
Wouter Edeling1, Hamid Arabnejad2, Robbie Sinclair3
1Scientific Computing Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract:
Epidemiological modelling has assisted in identifying interventions that reduce the impact of COVID-19. The UK government relied, in part, on the CovidSim model to guide its policy to contain the rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic during March and April 2020; however, CovidSim contains several sources of uncertainty that affect the quality of its predictions: parametric uncertainty, model structure uncertainty and scenario uncertainty. Here we report on parametric sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification of the code. From the 940 parameters used as input into CovidSim, we find a subset of 19 to which the code output is most sensitive-imperfect knowledge of these inputs is magnified in the outputs by up to 300%. The model displays substantial bias with respect to observed data, failing to describe validation data well. Quantifying parametric input uncertainty is therefore not sufficient: the effect of model structure and scenario uncertainty must also be properly understood.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Causality in Epidemiology
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Uncertainty: Overview
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

