Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Phylogeny

Phylogeny

Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic Trees

Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Taxonomy

Taxonomy

Taxonomy is the science of defining and naming groups of biological organisms based on shared characteristics. It uses a hierarchy of increasingly inclusive categories with Latin names. The smallest units of taxonomy, species and genus, are used to assign a formal, taxonomic name to each species in a system. This classification system, referred to as binomial nomenclature, was formalized by Carolus Linnaeus in the 18th century.
Hierarchy of Taxonomy
The hierarchy that Carolus Linnaeus first...

Synteny and Evolution

Synteny and Evolution

John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Hominin postcranial remains from Drimolen Main Quarry, South Africa.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026

Same author

The StW 573 Little Foot Fossil Should Not Be Attributed to Australopithecus prometheus.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025

Same author

Evaluating the Evolvability of Paranthropus Cranial Morphology in Relation to Feeding Biomechanics.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025

Same author

Skill and efficiency in Acheulian giant core reduction.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same author

Uniform, circular, and shallow enamel pitting in hominins: Prevalence, morphological associations, and potential taxonomic significance.

Journal of human evolution·2025

Same author

Bite force production and the origin of <i>Homo</i>.

Royal Society open science·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

A lineage perspective on hominin taxonomy and evolution.

Jesse M Martin¹, A B Leece^1,2, Stephanie E Baker³

¹Palaeoanthropology Lab, Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Evolutionary Anthropology

|January 13, 2024

Summary

Paleoanthropologists may be overestimating hominin species diversity. Relying solely on fossil morphology can be misleading; combining morphology with chronology offers a more accurate species identification method.

Keywords:

Homo australopith paleoanthropology species concept subspecies

More Related Videos

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Lineage Tracing and Clonal Analysis in Developing Cerebral Cortex Using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers MADM

Lineage Tracing and Clonal Analysis in Developing Cerebral Cortex Using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers MADM

Published on: May 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Lineage Tracing and Clonal Analysis in Developing Cerebral Cortex Using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers MADM

Lineage Tracing and Clonal Analysis in Developing Cerebral Cortex Using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers MADM

Published on: May 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Paleoanthropology
Evolutionary Biology
Paleontology

Background:

The phylogenetic species concept is widely used in paleoanthropology.
This concept often leads to a typological approach in defining new hominin species based on distinct morphological characters.
However, a species is ontologically a metapopulation lineage segment.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the impact of relying on morphological diagnosability for species delimitation in the hominin fossil record.
To propose a more robust method for testing the single-species null hypothesis.

Main Methods:

Analysis of species concept theory and its application to fossil data.
Comparison of species identification using morphology alone versus a combination of morphology and chronology.

Main Results:

An uncritical reliance on morphological diagnosability systematically overestimates hominin species diversity.
Morphological changes within a lineage can result in distinct early and late populations of the same species.
Chronological data alongside morphology provides a stronger test for species delimitation.

Conclusions:

The current typological approach based on morphology alone is insufficient for accurate hominin species delimitation.
Integrating chronological data with morphological analysis is crucial for a more reliable assessment of hominin species diversity.
This combined approach offers a more robust test of the single-species hypothesis in paleoanthropology.