Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
Are sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements related to later developmental functioning outcomes? A cohort
Bilge N Yardımcı-Lokmanoğlu1, Numan Demir2, Doğan Porsnok3
1Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Early Physiotherapy Unit, Ankara, Türkiye. bilgenuryardimci@hacettepe.edu.tr.
Insights
Early sucking patterns and spontaneous movements in at-risk infants predict later development. Abnormalities in Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) sucking and General Movements Assessment (GMA) predict developmental disorders.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal development
- Developmental pediatrics
- Movement science
Background:
- Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements are crucial for predicting developmental outcomes.
- Previous research has studied these factors separately, but their combined predictive value and long-term impact remain underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between sucking patterns (Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale - NOMAS) and general movements (General Movements Assessment - GMA) in at-risk infants.
- To determine the association between these early assessments and later developmental functioning outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal analysis of NOMAS (34 weeks postmenstrual age to 10 weeks post-term) and GMA (9-20 weeks post-term) in 102 at-risk infants.
- Developmental outcomes assessed using Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (Bayley-III) in 62 infants (12-42 months).
Main Results:
- A significant relationship was found between NOMAS and Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) from GMA (p<0.05).
- Both NOMAS and GMA (MOS-R) were significantly associated with later cognitive, language, and motor development (Bayley-III, p<0.05).
- Early spontaneous movements showed a higher predictive value for developmental outcomes than sucking patterns alone.
Conclusions:
- The quality of sucking patterns and general movements, including fidgety movements, are linked to later developmental functioning in at-risk infants.
- Abnormal sucking patterns, aberrant fidgety movements, and lower MOS-R scores may indicate a risk for developmental disorders.
- Combined assessment of sucking and movement patterns offers valuable insights into predicting developmental trajectories.
Abstract:
Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements have an important role in the determination of later developmental problems, but the relationship of the two together with long-term outcomes has not been investigated. The objectives of this study were to (i) examine the relationship between sucking patterns using the Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) and fidgety movements and other movement patterns using detailed General Movements Assessment (GMA), and (ii) investigate the relationship between these early assessment methods and developmental functioning outcomes at later ages. We analyzed the NOMAS from 34 weeks' postmenstrual age up to 10 weeks post-term and GMA between 9 and 20 weeks post-term age, and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (Bayley-III) was applied for the developmental functioning outcomes to 62 infants (61%, 62/102) between 12 and 42 months of age. Among 102 infants at-risk, 70 (69%) showed a normal sucking pattern, and 85 (83%) had fidgety movements. The median Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R), as determined by GMA, of all infants was 24. The NOMAS was related to the MOS-R and its subcategories (p < 0.05) in all infants at-risk. The NOMAS, MOS-R and its subcategories were also related to cognitive, language, and motor development at later ages according to Bayley-III (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This longitudinal study showed that the quality of sucking patterns, fidgety movements, and MOS-R were related to later developmental functioning, indicating that abnormal sucking patterns, aberrant fidgety movements, and lower MOS-R might predict developmental disorders. What is Known: • Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements in which central pattern generators play an important role are related. • Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements might be used separately to predict developmental outcomes. What is New: • Sucking patterns and early spontaneous movements, when used together, were related to later developmental functioning, including cognitive, language, and motor development in at-risk infants. • Predictive value of sucking patterns was lower for each developmental functioning outcome than early spontaneous movements.
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Attachment
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Oral
Weaning, typically occurring...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
The Nativist Approach
Psychosexual Theory of Development
The Five Stages of Psychosexual Development
Freud's...

