Low 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose dose positron emission tomography assisted by a deep-learning image-denoising technique in
Lei Yan1, Zhao Wang1, Dacheng Li1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Background:
Patients with lymphoma receive multiple positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) exams for monitoring of the therapeutic response. With PET imaging, a reduced level of injected fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) activity can be administered while maintaining the image quality. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of applying a deep learning (DL) denoising-technique on image quality and the quantification of metabolic parameters and Deauville score (DS) of a low [18F]FDG dose PET in patients with lymphoma.
Methods:
This study retrospectively enrolled 62 patients who underwent [18F]FDG PET scans. The low-dose (LD) data were simulated by taking a 50% duration of routine-dose (RD) PET list-mode data in the reconstruction, and a U-Net-based denoising neural network was applied to improve the images of LD PET. The visual image quality score (1 = undiagnostic, 5 = excellent) and DS were assessed in all patients by nuclear radiologists. The maximum, mean, and standard deviation (SD) of the standardized uptake value (SUV) in the liver and mediastinum were measured. In addition, lesions in some patients were segmented using a fixed threshold of 2.5, and their SUV, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. The correlation coefficient and limits of agreement between the RD and LD group were analyzed.
Results:
The visual image quality of the LD group was improved compared with the RD group. The DS was similar between the RD and LD group, and the negative (DS 1-3) and positive (DS 4-5) results remained unchanged. The correlation coefficients of SUV in the liver, mediastinum, and lesions were all >0.85. The mean differences of SUVmax and SUVmean between the RD and LD groups, respectively, were 0.22 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.19 to 0.64] and 0.02 (95% CI: -0.17 to 0.20) in the liver, 0.13 (95% CI: -0.17 to 0.42) and 0.02 (95% CI: -0.12 to 0.16) in the mediastinum, and -0.75 (95% CI: -3.42 to 1.91), and -0.13 (95% CI: -0.57 to 0.31) in lesions. The mean differences in MTV and TLG were 0.85 (95% CI: -2.27 to 3.98) and 4.06 (95% CI: -20.53 to 28.64) between the RD and LD groups.
Conclusions:
The DL denoising technique enables accurate tumor assessment and quantification with LD [18F]FDG PET imaging in patients with lymphoma.
