Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
The connection still matters: Therapeutic alliance with digital treatment for alcohol use disorder
Bryan Benitez1, Tami L Frankforter1, Charla Nich1
1Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Background:
A strong cooperative bond between the patient and provider ("therapeutic alliance") is robustly associated with better alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment outcomes. Although digital treatments for AUD have significant potential, the function of the alliance during digital programs is unclear. We compared the validity of patient-reported measures of the alliance with a digital treatment ("digital alliance") for AUD and the alliance with their clinician ("clinician alliance").
Methods:
We used data from an 8-week, randomized clinical trial of a computerized cognitive behavioral therapy program (CBT4CBT) during outpatient AUD treatment. Treatment conditions included CBT4CBT with minimal clinical monitoring (CBT4CBT + monitor) or with treatment as usual (CBT4CBT + TAU). The digital alliance and clinician alliance were measured with similar versions of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI). The WAI ratings were completed at the 2nd and 6th treatment sessions. A timeline followback calendar assessed daily alcohol use. Bayesian multilevel models compared the strength of the alliances and tested their associations with future alcohol use.
Results:
Data from 43 participants were included (age M = 44; 65% male; 51% Black, 40% White, 9% other; 14% Hispanic). The digital alliance ratings had similar internal reliability as the clinician alliance ratings (ω's > 0.90). Differences between digital alliance and clinician alliance ratings were negligible in both treatment conditions (BF01 = 9 and 31). During treatment, within-person increases in the digital alliance and the clinician alliance predicted modest decreases in future drinking to a similar degree (BF01 = 15). Alliance ratings were not associated with future drinking when posttreatment follow-up drinking data were included (BF10 < 3).
Conclusions:
The digital alliance with CBT4CBT was comparable to the clinician alliance. The digital alliance and clinician alliance had similar, albeit very small, associations with abstinence during treatment. Future research can explore how the digital alliance develops to improve AUD treatment efficacy.
More Related Videos
07:31Murine Drinking Models in the Development of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholism: Drinking in the Dark and Two-bottle Choice
Published on: January 7, 2019
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Couples Therapy
Core Principles and Techniques
Couples therapy often incorporates cognitive-behavioral principles to identify and modify negative...