Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

8.2K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
8.2K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.9K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluating Cardiovascular Devices Using Observational Analyses.

Circulation·2026
Same author

Estimating the Effect of Pravastatin versus Usual Care Under Full Adherence in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial-Lipid Lowering Trial (ALLHAT-LLT).

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Do We Still Need Randomized Controlled Trials to Support Use of New Methods of Breast Cancer Screening?

Journal of breast imaging·2025
Same author

Center-specific causal inference with multicenter trials-Interpreting trial evidence in the context of each participating center.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Estimating and Evaluating Counterfactual Prediction Models.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Cluster Randomized Trials Designed to Support Generalizable Inferences.

Sarah E Robertson1,2, Jon A Steingrimsson3, Issa J Dahabreh1,2,4

  • 1CAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Evaluation Review
|January 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a nested trial design for cluster randomized trials, enabling generalizable causal inferences even with non-random cluster sampling. Efficient estimation methods precisely quantify treatment effects in the target population.

Keywords:
causal inferencecluster randomized trialsdesigngeneralizabilityinterferencetransportability

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.7K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) often face challenges in generalizing findings due to practical sampling constraints.
  • Oversampling clusters based on characteristics can improve trial economy but may compromise generalizability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and evaluate a nested trial design for CRTs that allows for known, characteristic-dependent cluster sampling probabilities.
  • To develop methods for analyzing data from this design to ensure generalizable causal inferences to the target population.

Main Methods:

  • A nested trial design embedding randomized clusters within a larger cohort of eligible clusters.
  • Development and evaluation of statistical methods for identifying and estimating average potential outcomes and average treatment effects.
  • Simulation studies to assess bias and precision of proposed estimators.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods allow for precise quantification of treatment effects in the target population.
  • Estimators demonstrated low bias across simulation studies.
  • Different estimators exhibited varying levels of precision.

Conclusions:

  • The nested trial design, combined with efficient estimation, can address practical trial conduct needs while maintaining generalizability.
  • This approach enables precise causal inference in the target population, even with characteristic-based cluster selection.