Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Macro- and micro-genetic environmental sensitivity of yearling weight in Angus beef cattle
M D Madsen1, J H J van der Werf1, S Clark1
1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Abstract:
Australian beef cattle experience variable conditions, which may give rise to genotype-by-environment interactions depending on the genotypes' macro- and/or micro-genetic environmental sensitivity (GES). Macro-GES gives rise to genotype-by-environment interactions across definable and shared environments, while micro-GES causes heritable variation of phenotypes, e.g., the performance of progeny from one sire may be more variable than other sires. Yearling weight (YW) is a key trait in Australian Angus cattle that may be impacted by both macro- and micro-GES. Current models for genetic evaluation of YW attempt to account for macro-GES by fitting sire-by-herd interactions (S × H). Variation in micro-GES had not yet been estimated for YW in Australian Angus. The aim of this study was to estimate genetic variation due to macro- and micro-GES in YW of Australian Angus cattle. A reaction norm with contemporary group effects as the environmental covariate was fitted either as an alternative to or in combination with a random S × H effect to account for macro-GES. Double hierarchical generalised linear models (DHGLM), fitted as sire models, were used to estimate the genetic variance of the dispersion as a measure of micro-GES. Variation due to both macro- and micro-GES were found in YW. The variance of the slope of the reaction norm was 0.02-0.03 (SEs 0.00), while the S × H variance accounted for 7% of the phenotypic variance in all models. Results showed that both a random S × H effect and a reaction norm should be included to account for both macro-GES and the additional variation captured by an S × H effect. The heritability of the dispersion on the measurement scale ranged from 0.06 to 0.10 (SEs 0.00) depending on which model was used. It should therefore be possible to alter both macro- and micro-GES of YW in Australian Angus through selection. However, care should be taken to ensure an appropriate data structure when including sire-by-herd interactions in the mean part of a DHGLM; otherwise, it can cause biased estimates of micro-GES.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
14:40Instrumentation of Near-term Fetal Sheep for Multivariate Chronic Non-anesthetized Recordings
Published on: October 25, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Gene-Environment Interactions
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Lethal Alleles
Lucien Cuénot discovered lethal alleles in 1905 while studying the inheritance of coat color in mice. The agouti gene is responsible for the color of the coat in mice. This gene codes for an agouti-signaling protein, which is responsible for melanin distribution in mammals. The wild-type allele gives rise to gray-brown coat color in mice, while the mutant allele gives rise to yellow coat color. In addition to coat color, the agouti gene is associated with the yellow...