Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Glycemic Control for Critically Ill Children and Adults 2024
Kimia Honarmand1,2, Michael Sirimaturos3, Eliotte L Hirshberg4
1Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Mackenzie Health, Vaughan, ON, Canada.
Insights
This updated guideline recommends using insulin infusions for hyperglycemia in critically ill patients, guided by decision support tools and frequent monitoring, avoiding intensive glucose targets to minimize hypoglycemia.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Glycemic control in critically ill patients impacts survival and infection rates.
- Current guidelines require updating based on new systematic literature reviews.
- There is ongoing debate regarding optimal blood glucose targets and monitoring methods.
Approach:
- A multiprofessional task force updated 2012 guidelines using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
- A systematic review identified evidence for Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes (PICO) questions.
- Recommendations were formulated using an evidence-to-decision framework, including conditional recommendations and good practice statements.
Key Points:
- Insulin infusion is preferred for acute hyperglycemia management in adults and children.
- Titration should be guided by clinical decision support tools with frequent monitoring (≤ 1 hour) during instability.
- Avoid targeting intensive glucose levels to minimize hypoglycemia.
Conclusions:
- The guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for glycemic management in critically ill adults and children.
- Further research is needed on individualized targets, continuous glucose monitoring, and decision support tools.
- These recommendations aim to improve patient outcomes by optimizing insulin therapy protocols.
Rationale:
Maintaining glycemic control of critically ill patients may impact outcomes such as survival, infection, and neuromuscular recovery, but there is equipoise on the target blood levels, monitoring frequency, and methods.
Objectives:
The purpose was to update the 2012 Society of Critical Care Medicine and American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines with a new systematic review of the literature and provide actionable guidance for clinicians.
Panel Design:
The total multiprofessional task force of 22, consisting of clinicians and patient/family advocates, and a methodologist applied the processes described in the ACCM guidelines standard operating procedure manual to develop evidence-based recommendations in alignment with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach (GRADE) methodology. Conflict of interest policies were strictly followed in all phases of the guidelines, including panel selection and voting.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes question related to glycemic management in critically ill children (≥ 42 wk old adjusted gestational age to 18 yr old) and adults, including triggers for initiation of insulin therapy, route of administration, monitoring frequency, role of an explicit decision support tool for protocol maintenance, and methodology for glucose testing. We identified the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak or as a good practice statement. In addition, "In our practice" statements were included when the available evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation, but the panel felt that describing their practice patterns may be appropriate. Additional topics were identified for future research.
Results:
This guideline is an update of the guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. It is intended for adult and pediatric practitioners to reassess current practices and direct research into areas with inadequate literature. The panel issued seven statements related to glycemic control in unselected adults (two good practice statements, four conditional recommendations, one research statement) and seven statements for pediatric patients (two good practice statements, one strong recommendation, one conditional recommendation, two "In our practice" statements, and one research statement), with additional detail on specific subset populations where available.
Conclusions:
The guidelines panel achieved consensus for adults and children regarding a preference for an insulin infusion for the acute management of hyperglycemia with titration guided by an explicit clinical decision support tool and frequent (≤ 1 hr) monitoring intervals during glycemic instability to minimize hypoglycemia and against targeting intensive glucose levels. These recommendations are intended for consideration within the framework of the patient's existing clinical status. Further research is required to evaluate the role of individualized glycemic targets, continuous glucose monitoring systems, explicit decision support tools, and standardized glycemic control metrics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Overview of Carbohydrate Metabolism
Glucose transport into cells is facilitated by a family of transport proteins called GLUT (Glucose Transporters). GLUT4 is the primary glucose transporter for insulin-stimulated glucose...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

