Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023
Daniel De Backer1, Clifford S Deutschman2,3, Judith Hellman4
1Department of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
This study identifies key research priorities for sepsis and septic shock, focusing on early detection, organ injury, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor use, and personalized medicine. These priorities aim to reduce high mortality rates and address knowledge gaps in sepsis management.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Translational Research
Background:
- Sepsis and septic shock remain critical challenges with high mortality rates.
- Existing evidence for sepsis management has limitations, necessitating updated research priorities.
- The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Committee convened experts to identify critical knowledge gaps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish research priorities for the management, epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock.
- To update and refine research directions following the latest Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines.
- To provide a roadmap for future research endeavors in sepsis and septic shock.
Main Methods:
- A multiprofessional committee of 16 international experts was formed.
- Experts submitted and ranked research questions across clinical and basic science domains.
- The highest-rated questions were developed into the current research priorities.
Main Results:
- 81 initial research questions were narrowed down to 34 clinical and 10 basic science priorities.
- Top clinical priorities include sepsis screening/identification, organ injury mechanisms, individualized fluid resuscitation, optimal vasopressor strategies, and precision medicine approaches.
- Top basic science priorities focus on improving animal models, defining outcome variables, understanding sepsis effects on the brain and neuro-endocrine-immune interactions, microbiome influence, and genetic/epigenetic factors.
Conclusions:
- Significant knowledge gaps persist despite advances in sepsis management guidelines.
- The identified research priorities are crucial for advancing evidence-based care and reducing sepsis mortality.
- This research agenda aims to guide future studies to improve patient outcomes in sepsis and septic shock.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:

