Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

07:56
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
17.5K
Forensic age estimation of the knee by post-mortem DR, CT, and MR imaging: a comparative study
Apameh Khatam-Lashgari1, Mette Lønstrup Harving2, Chiara Villa3
1Department of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. apameh.khatam-lashgari@sund.ku.dk.
International Journal of Legal Medicine
|January 19, 2024
Summary
Reference data for age estimation using knee epiphysis ossification is not interchangeable across imaging modalities. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital radiography (DR) show varying agreement levels, necessitating modality-specific reference materials.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Anthropology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Age estimation is crucial in forensic science.
- Previous studies suggest imaging-modality-specific reference data may not be necessary for age estimation.
- Investigating agreement between modalities is needed to confirm or refute this.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the agreement between computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital radiography (DR) in evaluating knee epiphysis ossification for age estimation.
- To determine if reference data can be used interchangeably across these radiological modalities.
Main Methods:
- 34 deceased individuals aged 10-25 years underwent CT, MRI, and DR scans of the knee.
- Ossification stages of distal femoral, proximal tibial, and proximal fibular epiphyses were assessed.
- Cohen's weighted kappa was used to analyze agreement between modalities using established staging methods.
Main Results:
- Good agreement was found between CT and DR (K = 0.61-0.70) and MRI and DR (K = 0.68-0.79).
- Moderate agreement was observed between CT and MRI (K = 0.55-0.57).
- These findings indicate significant variability in agreement levels.
Conclusions:
- Radiological images from different modalities cannot be used interchangeably for age estimation.
- Reference data for age estimation must be imaging-modality specific.
- Further research with larger populations is recommended for broader conclusions.

