Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

09:52
DNA-barcode-based Multiplex Immunofluorescence Imaging to Analyze FFPE Specimens from Genetically Reprogrammed Murine Melanoma
Published on: June 6, 2025
204
Evaluating deep learning-based melanoma classification using immunohistochemistry and routine histology: A three
Christoph Wies1,2, Lucas Schneider1, Sarah Haggenmüller1
1Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Plos One
|January 19, 2024
Summary
Deep learning (DL) models analyzing MelanA immunohistochemical (IHC) slides show performance comparable to standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for melanoma diagnosis. Combining both IHC and H&E stains further improves diagnostic accuracy in deep learning assistance systems.
Area of Science:
- Computational pathology
- Digital diagnostics
- Biomedical imaging analysis
Background:
- Pathologists utilize hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and MelanA immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for accurate melanoma diagnosis.
- Deep learning (DL) systems excel in analyzing H&E slides but are less explored for IHC analysis.
- There is a need to evaluate DL performance on IHC slides for diagnostic support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic performance of DL models trained on MelanA IHC slides.
- To compare the performance of MelanA IHC DL models against H&E-based DL benchmarks.
- To investigate the combined performance of DL models using both MelanA IHC and H&E stains.
Main Methods:
- ResNet models were trained on MelanA IHC-stained and H&E-stained tissue slides.
- The performance of individual MelanA and H&E classifiers was evaluated on out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets.
- A combined classifier integrating both MelanA and H&E data was developed and tested.
Main Results:
- The MelanA DL classifier achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 (OOD), comparable to the H&E benchmark (AUROC 0.81).
- The H&E benchmark classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.75 on OOD datasets, while the MelanA classifier achieved 0.74.
- The combined MelanA and H&E classifier demonstrated improved performance with AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on OOD datasets.
Conclusions:
- DL-based assistance systems using MelanA IHC slides offer diagnostic performance similar to traditional H&E classification.
- Multi-stain DL classification, combining MelanA IHC and H&E, enhances diagnostic accuracy.
- These findings suggest potential for improved DL tools to aid pathologists in routine melanoma diagnosis.

