Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq03:21

RNA-seq

10.0K
RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases. 
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
10.0K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.9K
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

17.4K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
17.4K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

10.5K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
10.5K
Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

18.9K
The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
18.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery of a New Scaffold RSK2 Inhibitor With Virtual and Phenotypical Screening.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

Phagocytic remodeling in CD74<sup>High</sup> tumor-associated macrophages during brain metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma.

Translational cancer research·2026
Same author

Research on medical students' medical ethics reasoning ability-analysis based on the intermediate concept measurement method.

BMC medical ethics·2026
Same author

DeepCYP: an integrated deep learning web server for the holistic "pathway-site product" prediction of CYP450 metabolism.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

FluNexus: A versatile web platform for antigenic prediction and visualization of influenza A viruses.

iMeta·2026
Same author

Mosaic integration of spatial multi-omics with SpaMosaic.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

EDEL: Enhancing Dense Retrievers for Curation of Biomedical Knowledge Bases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Informative Relational Learning for Adverse Reaction Prediction with Enhanced Generalization to Novel Drugs.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

An interpretable deep learning framework uncovers features governing CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
11:52

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

6.0K

Assembling spatial clustering framework for heterogeneous spatial transcriptomics data with GRAPHDeep.

Teng Liu1,2, Zhaoyu Fang3, Xin Li1,2

  • 1Department of Clinical Research Center (CRC), Clinical Pathology Center (CPC), Cancer Early Detection and Treatment Center (CEDTC) and Translational Medicine Research Center (TMRC), Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, 404000, China.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|January 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

GRAPHDeep optimizes spatial transcriptomics analysis by selecting the best graph neural networks for accurate spatial clustering. It identifies key factors like gene count and recommends specific networks for improved biological insights.

More Related Videos

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
09:19

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

4.9K
ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data
05:12

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
11:52

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

6.0K
Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
09:19

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

4.9K
ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data
05:12

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Spatial transcriptomics enables high-resolution analysis of tissue microenvironments.
  • Spatial clustering is critical for understanding cellular organization and function.
  • Graph neural networks (GNNs) show promise for integrating spatial and gene expression data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a framework, GRAPHDeep, for selecting optimal GNNs for spatial clustering in spatial transcriptomics.
  • To investigate the impact of different graph deep learning modules and GNN architectures.
  • To provide guidance for choosing appropriate GNNs for spatial omics data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed GRAPHDeep, a framework integrating 2 graph deep learning modules and 20 GNNs.
  • Evaluated GNN performance on heterogeneous spatial transcriptomics datasets.
  • Compared GRAPHDeep's spatial clustering with state-of-the-art methods.

Main Results:

  • The number of genes/proteins significantly impacts spatial clustering performance.
  • Variational graph autoencoder outperformed deep graph infomax for this task.
  • Recommended GNNs include UniMP, SAGE, SuperGAT, GATv2, GCN, and TAG.
  • Existing spatial clustering frameworks may not use the optimal GNN.

Conclusions:

  • GRAPHDeep provides an effective approach for spatial clustering in spatial transcriptomics.
  • The study offers crucial insights into selecting appropriate GNNs for spatial omics data.
  • This work guides researchers in optimizing spatial clustering analysis for biological discovery.