Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Evaluation of Insurance Type as a Proxy for Socioeconomic Status in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Pilot Study
Michael C Monuteaux1, Michelle Du1, Mark I Neuman1
1Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Insights
Insurance status is an unreliable proxy for socioeconomic status in pediatric emergency medicine research. This study found insurance misclassified socioeconomic status in up to 23% of children, indicating potential bias in research.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Health
Background:
- Socioeconomic status (SES) is a critical determinant of health outcomes.
- Insurance status is often used as a proxy for SES in health research.
- The validity of using insurance status as a proxy for SES in pediatric emergency medicine is not well established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of insurance status as a proxy for socioeconomic status in pediatric emergency medicine research.
- To determine the concordance between insurance status and direct measures of SES (caregiver education and household income).
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted with 300 pediatric patients (ages 5-17) in a children's hospital emergency department.
- Socioeconomic status was assessed using caregiver education level and household income.
- Misclassification rates of insurance status (public vs. private) were calculated using education and income as reference standards.
Main Results:
- Insurance status misclassified socioeconomic status in 23% of patients when using caregiver education as the reference.
- Insurance status misclassified socioeconomic status in 14% of patients when using household income as the reference.
- Findings highlight significant discrepancies between insurance and direct SES measures.
Conclusions:
- Insurance status is an inadequate proxy for socioeconomic status in pediatric emergency medicine research, leading to potential bias.
- Researchers should carefully consider the limitations of using insurance status to adjust for SES.
- Further validation in larger, diverse populations, including adults, is recommended.
Study Objective:
To determine whether insurance status can function as a sufficient proxy for socioeconomic status in emergency medicine research by examining the concordance between insurance status and direct socioeconomic status measures in a sample of pediatric patients.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study of patients aged 5 to 17 years in the emergency department of a quaternary care children's hospital. Socioeconomic status was measured using the highest level of the caregiver's education (low: less than bachelor's degree; high: bachelor's or greater) and previous year household income (low: <$75,000; high: ≥$75,000). We calculated the misclassification rate of insurance status (low: public; high: private) using education and income as reference standards. Results were expressed as percentages with 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
In total, 300 patients were enrolled (median age 11 years, 44% female). Insurance status misclassified 23% (95% CI 18% to 28%) and 14% (95% CI 10% to 19%) of patients when using caregiver education and income, respectively, as reference standards.
Conclusions:
Insurance status misclassified socioeconomic status in up to 23% of pediatric patients, as measured by caregivers' education and income. Emergency medicine studies of pediatric patients using insurance as a covariate to adjust for socioeconomic status may need to consider this misclassification and the resulting potential for bias. These findings require confirmation in larger, more diverse samples, including adult patients.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

