Nanotherapeutics for prostate cancer treatment: A comprehensive review

Ruimin Hu1, Jin Lan2, Dinglin Zhang3

  • 1Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China; Department of Chemistry, College of Basic Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China; Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.

Biomaterials
|January 20, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Nanotherapeutics offer targeted prostate cancer (PCa) treatment with controlled release, showing promise in animal models. This review covers strategies, challenges, and future prospects for PCa nanomedicine development.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Nanomedicine
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of male mortality, with current treatments causing significant adverse effects.
  • Nanotherapeutics present a promising alternative due to their targeted delivery and controlled release capabilities for PCa.
  • Despite preclinical success, clinical translation of nanotherapeutics for PCa remains limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current strategies and challenges in prostate cancer treatment.
  • To comprehensively analyze nanotherapeutics for PCa, focusing on targeting, release, and mechanisms.
  • To outline future directions for nanotherapeutic development in PCa.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of prostate cancer treatment strategies.
  • Systematic review of nanotherapeutics for PCa, including targeting methods and controlled release.
  • Analysis of therapeutic approaches and mechanisms of nanomedicines in PCa models.

Main Results:

  • Nanotherapeutics demonstrate enhanced efficacy in preclinical PCa models compared to conventional therapies.
  • Various targeting strategies and controlled release mechanisms are employed in PCa nanomedicine.
  • Significant challenges persist in the clinical application of nanotherapeutics for prostate cancer.

Conclusions:

  • Nanotherapeutics hold significant potential for improved prostate cancer treatment outcomes.
  • Further research is needed to overcome clinical translation barriers for PCa nanomedicine.
  • Future prospects involve refining targeting, delivery, and therapeutic mechanisms for effective PCa nanotherapy.