Olivary body exposure through far lateral and lower retrosigmoid approaches. Comparative analysis of the exposed...

Throughout neurosurgical history, the treatment of intrinsic lesions located in the brainstem has been subject of much controversy. The brainstem is the anatomical structure of the central nervous system (CNS) that presents the highest concentration of nuclei and fibers, and its simple manipulation can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Once one of the safe entry points at the medulla oblongata has been established, we wanted to evaluate the safest approach to the olivary body (the most used safe entry zone on the anterolateral surface of the medulla oblongata). The proposed objective was to evaluate the working channel from the surface of each of the far lateral and retrosigmoid approaches to the olivary body: distances, angles of attack and channel content.

To complete this work, a total of 10 heads injected with red/blue silicone were used. A total of 40 approaches were made in the 10 heads used (20 retrosigmoid and 20 far lateral). After completing the anatomical study and obtaining the data referring to all the approaches performed, it was decided to expand the sample of this research study by using 30 high-definition magnetic resonance imaging of anonymous patients without cranial or cerebral pathology. The reference points used were the same ones defined in the anatomical study. After defining the working channels in each of the approaches, the working distances, angle of attack, exposed surface, and the number of neurovascular structures present in the central trajectory were analyzed.

The distances to the cranial and medial region of the olivary body were 52.71 mm (SD 3.59) from the retrosigmoid approach and 27.94 mm (SD 3.99) from the far lateral; to the most basal region of the olivary body, the distances were 49.93 (SD 3.72) from the retrosigmoid approach and 18.1 mm (SD 2.5) from the far lateral. The angle of attack to the caudal region was 19.44° (SD 1.3) for the retrosigmoid approach and 50.97° (SD 8.01) for the far lateral approach; the angle of attack to the cranial region was 20.3° (SD 1.22) for the retrosigmoid and 39.9° (SD 5.12) for the far lateral. Regarding neurovascular structures, the probability of finding an arterial structure is higher for the lateral far, whereas a neural structure will be more likely from a retrosigmoid approach.

As conclusions of this work, we can say that far lateral approach presents more favorable conditions for the microsurgical treatment of intrinsic bulbar and bulbomedullary lesions approached through the caudal half of the olivary body. In those cases of bulbar and pontine-bulbar lesions approached through the cranial half of the olivary body, the retrosigmoid approach can be considered for selected cases.