Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Untargeted Metabolomics from Biological Sources Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry UPLC-HRMS
Published on: May 20, 2013
Optimizing MS-Based Multi-Omics: Comparative Analysis of Protein, Metabolite, and Lipid Extraction Techniques
Jeong-Hun Mok1, Minjoong Joo2, Seonghyeon Cho2
1Department of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 115, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea.
This study compares multi-omics data processing methods, finding that filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) suits membrane proteins and suspension traps (S-Trap) suit nuclear proteins. Extraction method choice significantly impacts small molecule identification based on polarity.
Area of Science:
- Multi-omics research
- Biotechnology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Multi-omics integrates genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data for cellular mechanism understanding.
- Challenges include limited samples, complex data processing, and reproducibility issues.
- Existing studies often focus on technical performance rather than specific differences in omics data generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different sample preparation methods on multi-omics data.
- To compare extraction and protein digestion techniques for comprehensive biological insights.
- To guide the selection of optimal pre-processing strategies in multi-omics studies.
Main Methods:
- Profiling omics data using methanol, Folch, and Matyash extraction methods for metabolites and lipids.
- Comparing filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) and suspension traps (S-Trap) for protein digestion.
- Analyzing small molecule identification based on extraction solvent polarity and lipid hydrophobicity.
Main Results:
- FASP excelled in identifying membrane-related proteins; S-Trap was superior for nuclear and RNA-processing proteins.
- Single-phase extraction identified organic compounds and fatty acids; two-phase extraction identified hydrophilic compounds like nucleotides.
- Hydrophobic lipids (ChE, TG) were identified using two-phase extraction, highlighting solvent polarity's role in small molecule profiling.
Conclusions:
- The choice of protein digestion method (FASP vs. S-Trap) influences the types of proteins identified, suggesting specific applications for studying immune responses or neurodegenerative diseases.
- Extraction solvent polarity is a critical factor determining the identification of small molecules, impacting the scope of metabolomic and lipidomic analyses.
- This study provides detailed insights into sample preparation variables, aiding researchers in selecting appropriate multi-omics pre-processing techniques to minimize error and batch effects.
More Related Videos
10:37Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017
11:17A Simple Fractionated Extraction Method for the Comprehensive Analysis of Metabolites, Lipids, and Proteins from a Single Sample
Published on: June 1, 2017