Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Multiparametric MRI model with synthetic MRI, DWI multi-quantitative parameters, and differential sub-sampling with
Hua He1,2, Meina Song1,2, Zhaorong Tian1,2
1Department of Radiology, General Hospital of First Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
Objective:
To assess the feasibility and diagnostic performances of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (SyMRI) combined with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and differential subsampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO) in breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4 lesions.
Methods:
A total of 98 BI-RADS 4 patients, including 68 cases assigned to a malignant group and 33 cases assigned to a benign group, were prospectively enrolled, and their MRI and clinical information were collected. Two physicians jointly analyzed the characteristics of conventional MRI. T1, T2, proton density (PD), and ADC values were obtained from three different regions of interest (ROIs). Logistic regression analyses were used to select features and build models, and a nomogram was constructed with the best model.
Results:
Using the ROI delineation method at the most obvious enhancement to measure the ADC value revealed the best diagnostic performance in diagnosing BI-RADS type 4 mass lesions. The diagnostic efficiency of the maximum level drawing method of the quantitative relaxation model was better than that of the whole drawing method and the most obvious enhancement method. The best relaxation model (model A) was composed of two parameters: T2stand and ΔT1%stand (AUC=0.887), and the BI-RADS model (model B) was constructed by two MRI features of edge and TIC curve (AUC=0.793). Using the quantitative parameters of SyMRI and DWI of the best ROC method combined with DISCO enhanced MRI features to establish a joint diagnostic model (model C: edge, TIC curve type, ADClocal, T2stand, ΔT1%stand) showed the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC=0.953). The nomogram also had calibration curves with good overlap.
Conclusions:
The combined diagnosis model of SyMRI and DWI quantitative parameters combined with DISCO can improve the diagnostic efficiency of BI-RADS 4 types of mass lesions. Also, the line diagram based on this model can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic tool.
