Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Iris Fixation via External Pentagram Suturing
Published on: May 5, 2022
Physician responses to insurance benefit restrictions: The case of ophthalmology
Olukorede Abiona1,2, Phil Haywood2, Serena Yu2
1Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy (MUCHE), Macquarie University Business School (MQBS) and Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract:
This study examines the impact of social insurance benefit restrictions on physician behaviour, using ophthalmologists as a case study. We examine whether ophthalmologists use their market power to alter their fees and rebates across services to compensate for potential policy-induced income losses. The results show that ophthalmologists substantially reduced their fees and rebates for services directly targeted by the benefit restriction compared to other medical specialists' fees and rebates. There is also some evidence that they increased their fees for services that were not targeted. High-fee charging ophthalmologists exhibited larger fee and rebate responses while the low-fee charging group raise their rebates to match the reference price provided by the policy environment.
Related Concept Videos
Accessory Structures of the Eye
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Glaucoma: Overview
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...

