Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Julie Stevens1, Rose Miranda2, Peter Pype3
1End-of-Life Care Research Group, VUB & Universiteit Gent, Brussels; Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, VUB, Brussels; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Gent, Ghent.
A complex intervention for advance care planning (ACP) in general practice did not significantly improve patient engagement or GP self-efficacy compared to usual care. Both groups showed some improvement, possibly influenced by trial procedures and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Primary Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Advance care planning (ACP) is crucial for patients with chronic, life-limiting illnesses to communicate future care preferences.
- General practice faces significant barriers to implementing ACP effectively at patient, GP, and system levels.
- Complex interventions may be necessary to overcome these barriers and facilitate ACP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a complex ACP intervention (ACP-GP) delivered in a general practice setting.
- To assess the impact of the ACP-GP intervention on patient engagement in advance care planning.
- To determine the effect of the ACP-GP intervention on general practitioners' (GPs) self-efficacy in conducting ACP.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in Belgian general practice.
- The intervention (ACP-GP) comprised a patient workbook, GP training, dedicated ACP conversations, and a documentation template.
- Outcomes included patient ACP engagement (ACP Engagement Survey) and GP self-efficacy (ACP Self-Efficacy scale), assessed at 3 and 6 months post-baseline using linear mixed models.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in patient ACP engagement were found between the intervention and control groups at 3 or 6 months.
- Similarly, no significant differences in GP ACP self-efficacy were observed between the groups at either time point.
- Both intervention and control groups demonstrated a general increase in outcomes from baseline.
Conclusions:
- The ACP-GP intervention did not demonstrate superior effectiveness over usual care in enhancing patient engagement or GP self-efficacy.
- Factors such as trial procedures and the COVID-19 pandemic may have inadvertently increased awareness and engagement with ACP.
- Further research may be needed to refine complex interventions for effective ACP implementation in primary care settings.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Planning Nursing Care I
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Planning Nursing Care II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...