Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.6K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.4K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

3.9K
Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection and Phylogenetic Characterization of Canine Distemper Virus from a Red Fox in Hungary.

Viruses·2026
Same author

Rabies Reemergence, Central Europe, 2022-2024.

Emerging infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Manufacturability Assessment of Design Decisions for Reducing Material Diversity in Single-Piece and Small-Batch Production.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Multipurpose Passive Surveillance of Bat-Borne Viruses in Hungary: Lyssaviruses and Filoviruses in Focus.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same author

The Landscape of Wearable Sensors and Automated Literature Analysis with Large-Language Models.

ACS omega·2025
Same author

Cervids as a Promising Pillar of an Integrated Surveillance System for Emerging Infectious Diseases in Hungary: A Pilot Study.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

11.1K

From Anomaly Detection to Defect Classification.

Jaromír Klarák1, Robert Andok1, Peter Malík1

  • 1Institute of Informatics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 07 Bratislava, Slovakia.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel defect detection system using unsupervised and supervised machine learning to pinpoint exact damaged areas in gear wheel images. The approach effectively identifies and classifies defects, offering an alternative to existing detection methods.

Keywords:
anomaly detectionautoencoderautomationclusteringdeep learningdefect detectionvisual inspection

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
08:27

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.1K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

11.1K
Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
08:27

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.1K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Machine Learning
  • Industrial Inspection

Background:

  • Automated defect detection is crucial for quality control in manufacturing.
  • Existing methods often struggle to precisely localize diverse defect patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a defect detection system that accurately identifies and highlights exact damaged areas in visual data.
  • To propose a novel hybrid approach combining unsupervised and supervised learning for enhanced defect localization.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an autoencoder for anomaly detection by comparing original and reconstructed images.
  • Applied DBSCAN clustering to group anomalies into regions of interest.
  • Employed a pre-trained Xception network for supervised classification of detected defects.
  • Combined these into an unsupervised-unsupervised-supervised (U2S-CNN) methodology.

Main Results:

  • The system successfully identified 177 regions, with 108 correctly pinpointing 205 occurring damaged areas.
  • Achieved accurate localization of defects, demonstrating the system's focus on exact damaged areas.
  • Showcased the capability to detect a wide range of defect patterns.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed U2S-CNN system provides a viable proof of concept for precise defect area detection.
  • This approach offers a potential alternative to established methods like YOLO, autoencoders, and transformers for industrial inspection.
  • Highlights the effectiveness of combining different machine learning paradigms for complex visual tasks.