Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

110
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
110
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

142
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
142

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Task Interference in Prospective Memory: Adopting a Retrieval Mode and Checking for Targets.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

Emotional display rules in Palestine: Ingroup/outgroup membership, status of interaction partner and gender.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2017
Same author

The Future Orientation of Past Memory: The Role of BA 10 in Prospective and Retrospective Retrieval Modes.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2016
Same author

Relational and item-specific influences on generate-recognize processes in recall.

Memory & cognition·2014
Same author

Target preexposure eliminates the effect of distraction on event-based prospective memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2007
Same author

Brain regions and their dynamics in prospective memory retrieval: a MEG study.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2006
Same journal

Characterizing facilitators and barriers to Hypoglycemic Confidence among patients with diabetes: a qualitative descriptive study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the 7DHW questionnaire for the German population.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Ethical leadership and workplace equity: mediating and moderating mechanisms in emotional labor and well-being.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

How organizational support promotes teacher professional recognition: a perspective on teachers' autonomous learning and teaching abilities.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

From "performance competition arena" to "psychological exemption zone": psychological safety mechanisms in reverse mobility.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

General and sport-specific mental toughness in university students: associations with personality traits and physical activity.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K

Empirical factors affecting memory in collaborative versus nominal groups.

Melissa J Guynn1

  • 1Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.

Frontiers in Psychology
|January 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collaborative groups often remember less information than individuals working alone, a phenomenon called collaborative inhibition. This occurs due to cognitive factors impairing group recall performance.

Keywords:
collaborative groupcollaborative inhibitioncollaborative memorycollective memorycross cuing/cueinggroup rememberingnominal groupretrieval strategy disruption

More Related Videos

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.0K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K
Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.0K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Collaborative groups typically recall more information than individuals.
  • However, a nominal group (sum of individual recalls) often recalls more than a collaborative group.
  • This discrepancy is termed collaborative inhibition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review empirical factors contributing to collaborative inhibition.
  • To provide a resource for researchers studying collaborative recall.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing empirical research on collaborative inhibition.
  • Analysis of cognitive and social factors influencing group memory.

Main Results:

  • Collaborative inhibition is a well-documented phenomenon in group memory research.
  • Cognitive factors are considered more influential than social factors in causing collaborative inhibition.
  • Research has identified conditions that exacerbate or mitigate collaborative inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • Collaborative inhibition highlights a deficit in group memory performance.
  • Understanding the cognitive mechanisms is key to addressing this deficit.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the conditions and causes of collaborative inhibition.