Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

07:53
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
2.1K
Empirical factors affecting memory in collaborative versus nominal groups
1Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Frontiers in Psychology
|January 23, 2024
Summary
Collaborative groups often remember less information than individuals working alone, a phenomenon called collaborative inhibition. This occurs due to cognitive factors impairing group recall performance.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Collaborative groups typically recall more information than individuals.
- However, a nominal group (sum of individual recalls) often recalls more than a collaborative group.
- This discrepancy is termed collaborative inhibition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review empirical factors contributing to collaborative inhibition.
- To provide a resource for researchers studying collaborative recall.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing empirical research on collaborative inhibition.
- Analysis of cognitive and social factors influencing group memory.
Main Results:
- Collaborative inhibition is a well-documented phenomenon in group memory research.
- Cognitive factors are considered more influential than social factors in causing collaborative inhibition.
- Research has identified conditions that exacerbate or mitigate collaborative inhibition.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative inhibition highlights a deficit in group memory performance.
- Understanding the cognitive mechanisms is key to addressing this deficit.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the conditions and causes of collaborative inhibition.
Keywords:
collaborative groupcollaborative inhibitioncollaborative memorycollective memorycross cuing/cueinggroup rememberingnominal groupretrieval strategy disruptionMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Eyewitness Memory
110
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
110
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Interference and Decay
142
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
142

