Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Predicting transfers to intensive care in children using CEWT and other early warning systems
Kevin McCaffery1, Kyle A Carey2, Victoria Campbell1
1Queensland Health Patient Safety Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Insights
The Children's Early Warning Tool (CEWT) effectively predicts ICU transfers in children. However, the pediatric Calculated Assessment of Risk and Triage (pCART) demonstrated superior performance in predicting patient deterioration.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care medicine
- Clinical informatics
- Patient safety research
Background:
- The Children's Early Warning Tool (CEWT) is a widely adopted system for monitoring hospitalized children's risk of deterioration.
- Existing tools like Bedside Pediatric Early Warning Score (Bedside PEWS) and Between the Flags (BTF) are used alongside CEWT.
- The pediatric Calculated Assessment of Risk and Triage (pCART) is a newer, machine learning-based tool for risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive performance of CEWT against Bedside PEWS, BTF, and pCART.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of these early warning scores in identifying children at high risk for ICU transfer.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of different pediatric early warning systems.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study of over 50,000 pediatric admissions (2009-2019) at a major children's hospital.
- Comparison of prediction performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
- Analysis of alert rates at various score thresholds for each tool.
Main Results:
- CEWT showed good discrimination for predicting ICU transfers (AUC 0.74-0.79).
- In initial cohorts, CEWT performed comparably to Bedside PEWS (AUC 0.76) but better than BTF (AUC 0.66).
- The pCART tool demonstrated the highest predictive performance, particularly in later years (AUC 0.84).
Conclusions:
- CEWT is a valuable tool for identifying children at risk of ICU transfer.
- The pCART system exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to CEWT, Bedside PEWS, and BTF.
- Further research may explore the integration of advanced tools like pCART into clinical practice.
Background And Objective:
The Children's Early Warning Tool (CEWT), developed in Australia, is widely used in many countries to monitor the risk of deterioration in hospitalized children. Our objective was to compare CEWT prediction performance against a version of the Bedside Pediatric Early Warning Score (Bedside PEWS), Between the Flags (BTF), and the pediatric Calculated Assessment of Risk and Triage (pCART).
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective observational study of all patient admissions to the Comer Children's Hospital at the University of Chicago between 2009-2019. We compared performance for predicting the primary outcome of a direct ward-to-intensive care unit (ICU) transfer within the next 12 h using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Alert rates at various score thresholds were also compared.
Results:
Of 50,815 ward admissions, 1,874 (3.7%) experienced the primary outcome. Among patients in Cohort 1 (years 2009-2017, on which the machine learning-based pCART was trained), CEWT performed slightly worse than Bedside PEWS but better than BTF (CEWT AUC 0.74 vs. Bedside PEWS 0.76, P < 0.001; vs. BTF 0.66, P < 0.001), while pCART performed best for patients in Cohort 2 (years 2018-2019, pCART AUC 0.84 vs. CEWT AUC 0.79, P < 0.001; vs. BTF AUC 0.67, P < 0.001; vs. Bedside PEWS 0.80, P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values varied across all four tools at the examined thresholds for alerts.
Conclusion:
CEWT has good discrimination for predicting which patients will likely be transferred to the ICU, while pCART performed the best.

