Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

128
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
128
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

188
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
188
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

368
The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of...
368
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

141
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
141
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

95
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
95
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

436
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
436

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telehealth Use Among Older Adults Receiving Home- and Community-Based Services: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disabilities Survey.

JMIR human factors·2026
Same author

Improving transportability of regression calibration under the main/external validation study design.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

The effect of prenatal balanced energy and protein supplementation on small vulnerable newborn types in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Mechanistic insights into polystyrene micro/nanoplastics-facilitated cadmium trophic transfer and aggravated toxicity along a lettuce-snail terrestrial food chain.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2026
Same author

Statistical methods for clustered competing risk data when the event types are only available in a training dataset.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

The Role of Belatacept-Use and Senescence on Infectious and Mortality Complications After Kidney Transplantation.

Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Comparison between inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation in Cox model with missing failure subtype.

Fuyu Guo1, Benjamin Langworthy2, Shuji Ogino1,3,4,5

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|January 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Complete-case analysis is biased with missing disease subtypes, while inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation are valid if models are correctly specified. Multiple imputation is more efficient, but inverse-probability weighting is easier to use in practice.

Keywords:
Competing riskcomplete-case analysisinverse-probability weightingmissing disease subtypemultiple imputation

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Missing data in disease subtypes is a significant challenge in epidemiological studies.
  • Existing methods for handling missing data have not been thoroughly evaluated in competing risk settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss assumptions and implementation of complete-case analysis, inverse-probability weighting, and multiple imputation for missing disease subtypes in competing risk scenarios.
  • To compare these methods regarding bias, efficiency, and robustness using simulation studies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of statistical methods for missing data in competing risks.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate bias, efficiency, and robustness.
  • Development and demonstration of automated model selection procedures.

Main Results:

  • Complete-case analysis yields biased results when data are not missing completely at random.
  • Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation provide valid estimates if their respective models are correctly specified.
  • Multiple imputation generally offers higher efficiency than inverse-probability weighting, but inverse-probability weighting may be preferred for its simplicity in complex imputation scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of method for handling missing disease subtypes in competing risk analyses depends on data characteristics and analytical goals.
  • Inverse-probability weighting offers a practical alternative to multiple imputation when imputation model specification is challenging.
  • Automated model selection can aid in the application of these methods in real-world studies, such as the investigation of smoking and colorectal cancer.