A comparative analysis of mechanical and optical behavioral patterns of translucent zirconia ceramics
Nishanth A Sudharson1, Nitasha Gandhi, Harit Talwar
1Department of Prosthodontics, Christian Dental College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Aim:
This research aimed to assess and compare the translucency and mechanical properties of partially stabilized zirconia in contrast to lithium disilicate, particularly within the context of translucent zirconia.
Settings And Design:
The experimental design entails examining fifty samples, with ten drawn from each of the five distinct categories of ceramic materials, as part of this in vitro study. Translucency is measured using the Konica Minolta CM-3600D spectrophotometer, assessing Delta E through Lab values against white and black backgrounds. Flexural strength is analyzed via a 3-point bend test on a universal testing machine, with a controlled crosshead speed set at 1 mm/min.
Materials And Methods:
The study included the five categories of ceramic materials, each consisting of ten samples: High-strength zirconia (Katana HT), translucent zirconia (e.max Zircad MT and Cercon ht ML), and lithium disilicate (Press MT and LT). The Konica Minolta CM-3600D spectrophotometer is utilized to measure the translucency parameter. This involves determining the color difference (Delta E) by comparing the L*a*b values against both white and black backgrounds. The flexural strength (FS) of zirconia and lithium disilicate materials was analyzed through a 3-point bend test, aiming to compare their respective strengths. The testing procedure was carried out on a universal testing machine with a controlled crosshead speed set at 1 mm/min. The FS was calculated using the formula σ = FL/πR3 for circular disks, where σ represents the FS, F is the fracture load, L is the span length in millimeters, and R is the radius of the disk.
Statistical Analysis Used:
The Student's t-test was employed for statistical analysis.
Results:
The mean translucency parameter for e.max Press MT (6.33 ± 1.05) was significantly greater than all the specimens investigated. The Cercon ht ML exhibited a slightly higher translucency (2.18 ± 0.52) compared to e.max Zircad MT (1.49 ± 0.69), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.022). Conversely, the FS of e.max Zircad MT (26.97 ± 2.06) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that of Cercon ht ML (23.25 ± 2.36). Notably, the Katana HT material demonstrated the highest load strength (32.92 ± 3.10), a statistically significant difference compared to its counterparts (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Among the materials tested, lithium disilicate ceramics exhibited the highest translucency, with its MT variant demonstrating the lowest strength. Katana HT displayed significantly greater biaxial FS compared to translucent zirconia, surpassing even lithium disilicate. Translucent zirconia proved to be notably more translucent than high-strength zirconia. Within the category of translucent zirconia, e.max Zircad MT exhibited substantially higher FS than Cercon.
